Abstract
Publication and related biases constitute serious threats to the validity of research synthesis. If research syntheses are based on a biased selection of the available research, there is an increased risk of producing misleading results. The purpose fo this study is to explore the extent of positive outcome bias, time-lag bias, and place-of-publication bias in published research on the effects of psychological, social, and behavioral interventions. The results are based on 527 Swedish outcome trials published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and 2019. We found no difference in the number of studies reporting significant compared to non-significant findings or in the number of studies reporting strong effect sizes in the published literature. We found no evidence of time-lag bias or place-of-publication bias in our results. The average reported effect size remained constant over time as did the proportion of studies reporting significant effects.
Funder
Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.;D Moher;Systematic Reviews.,2015
2. Registratin of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting.;MJ Page;Systematic Reviews.,2018
3. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth;WB Strong;Journal of Pediatrics,2005
4. Youth suicide risk and preventive interventions: a review of the past 10 years.;MS Gould;Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adoilescent Psychiatry.,2003
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献