Knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with vitamin D supplementation: A cross-sectional online community survey of adults in the UK

Author:

Tanna Nuttan KantilalORCID,Karki Manisha,Webber Iman,Alaa Aos,El-Costa AustenORCID,Blair Mitch

Abstract

Objective Assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of a diverse population. Identify barriers and facilitators that inform routine vitamin D supplementation and self-care in the community setting. Design Cross-sectional online voluntary survey. Electronic survey link published on college Qualtrics platform and advertised widely. Study information provided with Participant Information Sheet. Setting and participants 556 community dwelling adults across the UK. Methods The overarching study included two phases, incorporating quantitative and qualitative methodologies. This paper reports findings from the first phase of the FABCOM-D (Facilitators and Barriers to Community (Healthy) Vitamin D status) study. Online survey questions were iteratively developed after background literature searches and piloted to ensure clarity and ease of understanding. Survey responses summarised using frequencies and percentages, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression models explored for any association. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys guided reporting. Statistical analysis performed using IBM SPSS software. Main outcome measures Awareness of vitamin D information sources, health benefits and testing. Attitudes to supplementation, sun exposure and fortification. Results Three quarters of the community had some awareness of vitamin D and around half were taking supplements. The two most trusted sources of information included health professionals and the NHS website. Participants were willing to pay for supplements, supporting a self-care agenda. With increasing age, there was significant reduced intake of vitamin D supplements. This aspect needs to be explored further as this could be a concern in deficiency status in the elderly. There was acceptance of food fortification but uncertainty on how to balance food intake with supplementation. Conclusion We were successful in eliciting views on KAPs around vitamin D from a community population including a large proportion of Black and Minority Ethnic individuals. The community wanted information and guidance to help manage individual vitamin D status, especially for high-risk groups, and on balancing supplementation, food fortification and sun exposure.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference50 articles.

1. Vitamin D and bone;DD Bikle;Curr Osteoporos Rep,2012

2. Vitamin d deficiency-an ignored epidemic;Z. Naeem;Int J Health Sci (Qassim),2010

3. Vitamin D Supplementation: What’s Known, What to Do, and What’s Needed;ST Haines;Pharmacotherapy,2012

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Vitamin D: supplement use in specific population groups Public health guideline [PH56]. 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph56

5. Global Consensus Recommendations on Prevention and Management of Nutritional Rickets;CF Munns;J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3