Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study

Author:

Greene Ciara M.ORCID,Murphy GillianORCID

Abstract

In recent years there has been an explosion of research on misinformation, often involving experiments where participants are presented with fake news stories and subsequently debriefed. In order to avoid potential harm to participants or society, it is imperative that we establish whether debriefing procedures remove any lasting influence of misinformation. In the current study, we followed up with 1547 participants one week after they had been exposed to fake news stories about COVID-19 and then provided with a detailed debriefing. False memories and beliefs for previously-seen fake stories declined from the original study, suggesting that the debrief was effective. Moreover, the debriefing resulted in reduced false memories and beliefs for novel fake stories, suggesting a broader impact on participants’ willingness to accept misinformation. Small effects of misinformation on planned health behaviours observed in the original study were also eliminated at follow-up. Our findings suggest that when a careful and thorough debriefing procedure is followed, researchers can safely and ethically conduct misinformation research on sensitive topics.

Funder

Health Research Board

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference55 articles.

1. Wardle C, Derakhshan H. Thinking about ‘information disorder’: formats of misinformation, disinformation, and mal-information. Ireton, Cherilyn; Posetti, Julie Journalism,‘fake news’& disinformation Paris: Unesco. 2018:43–54.

2. The science of fake news;DM Lazer;Science,2018

3. World Health Organization. Working together to tackle the “infodemic” 2020 updated 29th June 2020. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Health-systems/pages/news/news/2020/6/working-together-to-tackle-the-infodemic.

4. Coronavirus goes viral: quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter;R Kouzy;Cureus,2020

5. Brennen JS, Simon FM, Howard PN, Nielsen RK. Types, sources, and claims of Covid-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute. 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3