Abstract
Background
Decision impact studies have become increasingly prevalent in genomic medicine, particularly in cancer research. Such studies are designed to provide evidence of clinical utility for genomic tests by evaluating their impact on clinical decision-making. This paper offers insights into understanding of the origins and intentions of these studies through an analysis of the actors and institutions responsible for the production of this new type of evidence.
Methods
We conducted bibliometric and funding analyses of decision impact studies in genomic medicine research. We searched databases from inception to June 2022. The datasets used were primarily from Web of Science. Biblioshiny, additional R-based applications, and Microsoft Excel were used for publication, co-authorship and co-word analyses.
Results
163 publications were included for the bibliometric analysis; a subset of 125 studies were included for the funding analysis. Included publications started in 2010 and increased steadily over time. Decision impact studies were primarily produced for proprietary genomic assays for use in cancer care. The author and affiliate analyses reveal that these studies were produced by ‘invisible colleges’ of researchers and industry actors with collaborations focused on producing evidence for proprietary assays. Most authors had an industry affiliation, and the majority of studies were funded by industry. While studies were conducted in 22 countries, the majority had at least one author from the USA.
Discussion
This study is a critical step in understanding the role of industry in the production of new types of research. Based on the data collected, we conclude that decision impact studies are industry-conceived and -produced evidence. The findings of this study demonstrate the depth of industry involvement and highlight a need for further research into the use of these studies in decision-making for coverage and reimbursement.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference47 articles.
1. Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling in women with early breast cancer: An overview of systematic reviews;M Marrone;Genetics in medicine,2015
2. Breast cancer, screening and diagnostic tools: All you need to know.;D Barba;Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.,2021
3. Decision impact studies, evidence production and clinical utility in genomic testing in cancer care: A scoping review;G. Parker;Plos One,2023
4. Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in people with breast cancer (update of DG10).;S Harnan;Technology Assessment Report: Final report to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence;,2017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献