Recombinant protein KR95 as an alternative for serological diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas

Author:

Fujimori Mahyumi,Valencia-Portillo Ruth TamaraORCID,Lindoso José Angelo Lauletta,Celeste Beatriz Julieta,de Almeida Roque Pacheco,Costa Carlos Henrique Nery,da Cruz Alda MariaORCID,Druzian Angelita Fernandes,Duthie Malcolm Scott,Fortaleza Carlos Magno Castelo Branco,Oliveira Ana Lúcia Lyrio de,Paniago Anamaria Mello Miranda,Queiroz Igor ThiagoORCID,Reed Steve,Vallur Aarthy C.,Goto Hiro,Sanchez Maria Carmen ArroyoORCID

Abstract

In the Americas, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is caused by the protozoan Leishmania infantum, leading to death if not promptly diagnosed and treated. In Brazil, the disease reaches all regions, and in 2020, 1,933 VL cases were reported with 9.5% lethality. Thus, an accurate diagnosis is essential to provide the appropriate treatment. Serological VL diagnosis is based mainly on immunochromatographic tests, but their performance may vary by location, and evaluation of diagnostic alternatives is necessary. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of ELISA with the scantily studied recombinant antigens, K18 and KR95, comparing their performance with the already known rK28 and rK39. Sera from parasitologically confirmed symptomatic VL patients (n = 90) and healthy endemic controls (n = 90) were submitted to ELISA with rK18 and rKR95. Sensitivity (95% CI) was, respectively, 83.3% (74.2–89.7) and 95.6% (88.8–98.6), and specificity (95% CI) was 93.3% (85.9–97.2) and 97.8% (91.8–99.9). For validation of ELISA with the recombinant antigens, we included samples from 122 VL patients and 83 healthy controls collected in three regions in Brazil (Northeast, Southeast, and Midwest). When comparing the results obtained with the VL patients’ samples, significantly lower sensitivity was obtained by rK18-ELISA (88.5%, 95% CI: 81.5–93.2) compared with rK28-ELISA (95.9%, 95% CI: 90.5–98.5), but the sensitivity was similar comparing rKR95-ELISA (95.1%, 95% CI: 89.5–98.0), rK28-ELISA (95.9%, 95% CI: 90.5–98.5), and rK39-ELISA (94.3%, 95% CI: 88.4–97.4). Analyzing the specificity, it was lowest with rK18-ELISA (62.7%, 95% CI: 51.9–72.3) with 83 healthy control samples. Conversely, higher and similar specificity was obtained by rKR95-ELISA (96.4%, 95% CI: 89.5–99.2), rK28-ELISA (95.2%, 95% CI: 87.9–98.5), and rK39-ELISA (95.2%, 95% CI: 87.9–98.5). There was no difference in sensitivity and specificity across localities. Cross-reactivity assessment, performed with sera of patients diagnosed with inflammatory disorders and other infectious diseases, was 34.2% with rK18-ELISA and 3.1% with rKR95-ELISA. Based on these data, we suggest using recombinant antigen KR95 in serological assays for VL diagnosis.

Funder

Laboratórios de Investigação Médica - Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference42 articles.

1. CDC—DPDx Laboratory Identification of Parasites of Public Health Concern. Leishmaniasis. In: Leishmaniasis [Internet]. 14 Dec 2017 [cited 5 Oct 2022]. https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/leishmaniasis/index.html

2. PAHO/WHO. Leishmaniasis. In: Leishmaniasis [Internet]. [cited 5 Oct 2022]. https://www.paho.org/en/topics/leishmaniasis

3. WHO. Leishmaniasis—Key facts. [cited 5 Oct 2022]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis

4. Global leishmaniasis a baseline for the 2030 roadmap Surveillance mondiale de la leishmaniose: 2019–2020, une période de référence pour la feuille de route à l ‘ horizon 2030;JA Ruiz-Postigo;Wkly Epidemiol Rec,2021

5. Sinan/SVS/MS. Taxa de letalidade de leishmaniose visceral. Brasil, Grandes Regiões e Unidades Federadas. 2000 a 2020. 2021 [cited 5 Oct 2022]. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z/l/leishmaniose-visceral/arquivos/lv-letalidade.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3