Is massage a legitimate part of nursing care? A qualitative study

Author:

Da Rocha Rodrigues GoraORCID,Anex AdrienORCID,Boegli Monique,Bollondi Pauly Catherine,Curtin François,Luthy Christophe,Desmeules Jules,Cedraschi ChristineORCID

Abstract

Introduction The use of massage therapy has received increased attention in the treatment of chronic pain. However, barriers can hinder its use in nursing care. This study uses a qualitative methodology to explore professionals’ experiences regarding touch massage (TM) and identify barriers and facilitators for the implementation of this intervention. Materials and methods This study is part of a larger research program aimed at investigating the impact of TM on the experiences of patients with chronic pain hospitalized in two units of an internal medicine rehabilitation ward. Health care professionals (HCPs) were trained either to provide TM or to use of a massage-machine device according to their units. At the end of the trial, two focus groups were conducted with HCPs from each unit who took part in the training and agreed to discuss their experience: 10 caregivers from the TM group and 6 from the machine group. The focus group discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results Five themes emerged from thematic content analysis: perceived impact on patients, HCPs’ affective and cognitive experiences, patient-professionals relationships, organizational tensions, and conceptual tensions. Overall, the HCPs reported better general outcomes with TM than with the machine. They described positive effects on patients, HCPs, and their relationships. Regarding interventions’ implementation, the HCPs reported organizational barriers such as patients’ case complexity, work overload, and lack of time. Conceptual barriers such as ambivalence around the legitimacy of TM in nursing care were reported. TM was often described as a pleasure care that was considered a complementary approach and was overlooked despite its perceived benefits. Conclusion Despite the perceived benefits of TM reported by the HCPs, ambivalence arose around the legitimacy of this intervention. This result emphasizes the importance of changing HCPs’ attitudes regarding a given intervention to facilitate its implementation.

Funder

Fondation Leenaards

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference39 articles.

1. Epidemiology of chronic non-cancer pain in Europe: narrative review of prevalence, pain treatments and pain impact;KJ Reid;Current Medical Research and Opinion,2011

2. Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States;RJ Yong;Pain,2022

3. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11;R-D Treede;Pain,2015

4. Use of multidomain management strategies by community dwelling adults with chronic pain: evidence from a systematic review;DR Axon;Scandinavian Journal of Pain,2019

5. Massage for Pain: An Evidence Map;IM Miake-Lye;Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3