Abstract
Background
Online administration of surveys has a number of advantages but can also lead to increased exposure to bad actors (human and non-human bots) who can try to influence the study results or to benefit financially from the survey. We analyze data collected through an online discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey to evaluate the likelihood that bad actors can affect the quality of the data collected.
Methods
We developed and fielded a survey instrument that included two sets of DCE questions asking respondents to select their preferred treatments for multiple myeloma therapies. The survey also included questions to assess respondents’ attention while completing the survey and their understanding of the DCE questions. We used a latent-class model to identify a class associated with perverse preferences or high model variance, and the degree to which the quality checks included in the survey were correlated with class membership. Class-membership probabilities for the problematic class were used as weights in a random-parameters logit to recover population-level estimates that minimizes exposure to potential bad actors.
Results
Results show a significant proportion of respondents provided answers with a high degree of variability consistent with responses from bad actors. We also found that a wide-ranging selection of conditions in the survey screener is more consistent with choice patterns expected from bad actors looking to qualify for the study. The relationship between the number of incorrect answers to comprehension questions and problematic choice patterns peaked around 5 out of 10 questions.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need for a robust discussion around the appropriate way to handle bad actors in online preference surveys. While exclusion of survey respondents must be avoided under most circumstances, the impact of “bots” on preference estimates can be significant.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference37 articles.
1. Conducting online surveys;M. Van Selm;Quality and quantity,2006
2. A primer for conducting survey research using MTurk: Tips for the field;S. Chambers;International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET),2016
3. Introduction to psychological experiments on the internet;M.H. Birnbaum;Psychological experiments on the Internet,2000
4. Finding the signal in the noise: Minimizing responses from bots and inattentive humans in online research;C. Yarrish;The Behavior Therapist,2019
5. Patient preferences for ketamine-based antidepressant treatments in treatment-resistant depression: Results from a clinical trial and panel;A.O. Fairchild;Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research,2020
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献