Frequency of unnecessary prenatal diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies: A large retrospective analysis and implication to improvement of the control program

Author:

Singha Kritsada,Yamsri Supawadee,Chaibunruang Attawut,Srivorakun Hataichanok,Sanchaisuriya Kanokwan,Fucharoen Goonnapa,Fucharoen SupanORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the frequency and etiology of unnecessary prenatal diagnosis for hemoglobinopathies during 12 years of services at a single university center in Thailand.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of prenatal diagnosis during 2009–2021. A total of 4,932 couples at risk and 4,946 fetal specimens, including fetal blood (5.6%), amniotic fluid (92.3%), and chorionic villus samples (2.2%) were analyzed. Identification of mutations causing hemoglobinopathies was carried out by PCR-based methods. Maternal contamination was monitored by analysis of the D1S80 VNTR locus.ResultsAmong 4,946 fetal specimens, 12 were excluded because of poor PCR amplification, maternal contamination, non-paternity, and inconsistency of the results of the fetuses and parents. Breakdown of 4,934 fetuses revealed 3,880 (78.6%) at risk for the three severe thalassemia diseases, including β-thalassemia major, Hb E-β-thalassemia, and homozygous α0-thalassemia, 58 (1.2%) at risk for other α-thalassemia diseases, 168 (3.4%) at risk for β+-thalassemia, 109 (2.2%) at risk for high Hb F determinants, 16 (0.3%) at risk for abnormal Hbs, and 294 (6.0%) with no risk of having severe hemoglobinopathies. The parents of 409 (8.3%) fetuses had inadequate data for fetal risk assessment. Overall, we encountered unnecessary prenatal diagnostic requests for 645 (13.1%) fetuses.ConclusionsThe frequency of unnecessary prenatal diagnosis was high. This could lead to unnecessary risk of complications associated with fetal specimen collection, psychological impacts to the pregnant women and their families, as well as laboratory expenses and workload.

Funder

Thailand Research Fund

National Research Council of Thailand

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3