Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations

Author:

Royston RachelORCID,Naughton Stephen,Hassiotis Angela,Jahoda Andrew,Ali Afia,Chauhan Umesh,Cooper Sally-Ann,Kouroupa Athanasia,Steed Liz,Strydom AndreORCID,Taggart Laurence,Rapaport Penny

Abstract

ObjectivesApproximately 10% of people with intellectual disability display aggressive challenging behaviour, usually due to unmet needs. There are a variety of interventions available, yet a scarcity of understanding about what mechanisms contribute to successful interventions. We explored how complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour work in practice and what works for whom by developing programme theories through contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations.MethodsThis review followed modified rapid realist review methodology and RAMESES-II standards. Eligible papers reported on a range of population groups (intellectual disability, mental health, dementia, young people and adults) and settings (community and inpatient) to broaden the scope and available data for review.ResultsFive databases and grey literature were searched and a total of 59 studies were included. We developed three overarching domains comprising of 11 contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations; 1. Working with the person displaying aggressive challenging behaviour, 2. Relationships and team focused approaches and 3. Sustaining and embedding facilitating factors at team and systems levels. Mechanisms underlying the successful application of interventions included improving understanding, addressing unmet need, developing positive skills, enhancing carer compassion, and boosting staff self-efficacy and motivation.ConclusionThe review emphasises how interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour should be personalised and tailored to suit individual needs. Effective communication and trusting relationships between service users, carers, professionals, and within staff teams is essential to facilitate effective intervention delivery. Carer inclusion and service level buy-in supports the attainment of desired outcomes. Implications for policy, clinical practice and future directions are discussed.Prospero registration numberCRD42020203055.

Funder

Programme Grants for Applied Research

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference96 articles.

1. Violent psychiatric inpatients in a public hospital.;EF Morrison;Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice,1990

2. Characteristics of aggressive behavior in people with mild to borderline intellectual disability and co-occurring psychopathology;KJ van den Bogaard;Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities,2018

3. Challenging behaviours in adults with an intellectual disability: A total population study and exploration of risk indices;DL Bowring;British Journal of Clinical Psychology,2017

4. Profiles and correlates of aggressive behaviour among adults with intellectual disabilities;AG Crocker;Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,2007

5. Physical aggression towards others in adults with learning disabilities: prevalence and associated factors;F Tyrer;Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,2006

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Virtual Reality Aggression Prevention Training for People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities: A Feasibility Study;Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities;2023-11-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3