Abstract
Administering drug at a dose lower than that used in pivotal clinical trials, known as fractional dosing, can stretch scarce resources. Implementing fractional dosing with confidence requires understanding a drug’s dose-response relationship. Clinical trials aimed at describing dose-response in scarce, efficacious drugs risk underdosing, leading dose-finding trials to not be pursued despite their obvious potential benefit. We developed a new set of response-adaptive randomized dose-finding trials and demonstrate, in a series of simulated trials across diverse dose-response curves, these designs’ efficiency in identifying the minimum dose that achieves satisfactory efficacy. Compared to conventional designs, these trials have higher probabilities of identifying lower doses while reducing the risks of both population- and subject-level underdosing. We strongly recommend that, upon demonstration of a drug’s efficacy, pandemic drug development swiftly proceeds with response-adaptive dose-finding trials. This unified strategy ensures that scarce effective drugs produce maximum social benefits.
Funder
National Cancer Institute
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference43 articles.
1. Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions;G Persad;Lancet,2009
2. Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19;EJ Emanuel;N Engl J Med,2020
3. The ethics of expanding access to cheaper, less effective treatments;GC Persad;Lancet,2016
4. Socially optimal pandemic drug dosing;GW Strohbehn;The Lancet Global Health,2021
5. Applied clinical pharmacology in a crisis: Interleukin-6 axis blockade and COVID-19;GW Strohbehn;Clin Pharmacol Therapeut
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献