Comparison of survival times of advanced cancer patients with palliative care at home and in hospital

Author:

Hamano JunORCID,Takeuchi Ayano,Mori Masanori,Saitou Yasuhiro,Yamaguchi Takahide,Miyata Nobuyuki,Shimizu Masakatsu,Yamamoto Ryo,Kimura Yousuke,Kamiyama Yoshiyuki,Arai Yasuyuki,Matsuo Hiroshi,Shishido Hideki,Nakano Kazushi,Nishi Tomohiro,Nagaoka Hiroka,Yokomichi Naosuke,Maeda Isseki,Yamaguchi Takashi,Morita Tatsuya,Shinjo Takuya

Abstract

Objectives One primary concern about receiving care at home is that survival might be shortened because the quality and quantity of treatment provided at home will be inferior to that given in the hospital. Although our previous study demonstrated a longer survival of those with home-based palliative care (PC), it lacked adjustment for some potential confounders including symptoms and treatments during the stay. We aimed to compare the survival times among advanced cancer patients receiving home-based and hospital-based PC with adjusting for symptoms and treatments. Method We compared survival time of participants who enrolled two multicenter, prospective cohort studies of advanced cancer patients at 45-home-based PC services between July 2017 and December 2017, and at 23-hospital-based PC services between January 2017 and December 2017. We analyzed with stratification by the estimated survival of Days, Weeks, and Months, which were defined by modified Prognosis in Palliative care Study predictor models-A. We conducted a Cox regression analysis with adjusting for potential confounders including symptoms and treatments during the stay. Results A total of 2,998 patients were enrolled in both studies and 2,878 patients were analyzed; 988 patients receiving home-based PC and 1,890 receiving hospital-based PC. The survival time of patients receiving home-based PC was significantly longer than that of patients receiving hospital-based PC for the Days Prognosis (estimated median survival time: 10 days [95% CI 8.1–11.8] vs. 9 days [95% CI 8.3–10.4], p = 0.157), the Weeks prognosis (32 days [95% CI 28.9–35.4] vs. 22 days [95% CI 20.3–22.9], p < 0.001), and the Months Prognosis, (65 days [95% CI 58.2–73.2] vs. 32 days [95% CI 28.9–35.4], p < 0.001). Conclusion In this cohort of advanced cancer patients with a Weeks or Months prognosis, those receiving home-based PC survived longer than those receiving hospital-based PC after adjusting for symptoms and treatments.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference39 articles.

1. Good death in Japanese cancer care: a qualitative study;K Hirai;J Pain Symptom Manage,2006

2. Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study;M Miyashita;Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol,2007

3. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers’ mental health;AA Wright;J Clin Oncol,2010

4. Place of care in advanced cancer: A qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences;IJ Higginson;J Palliat Med,2000

5. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: A systematic review. BMC Palliative Care;B Gomes;BMC Palliat Care,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3