Uncomfortably high: Testing reveals inflated THC potency on retail Cannabis labels

Author:

Schwabe Anna L.,Johnson Vanessa,Harrelson Joshua,McGlaughlin Mitchell E.ORCID

Abstract

Legal Cannabis products in the United States are required to report THC potency (total THC % by dry weight) on packaging, however concerns have been raised that reported THC potency values are inaccurate. Multiple studies have demonstrated that THC potency is a primary factor in determining pricing for Cannabis flower, so it has an outsized role in the marketplace. Reports of inflated THC potency and “lab shopping” to obtain higher THC potency results have been circulating for some time, but a side-by-side investigation of the reported potency and flower in the package has not previously been conducted. Using HPLC, we analyzed THC potency in 23 samples from 10 dispensaries throughout the Colorado Front Range and compared the results to the THC potency reported on the packaging. Average observed THC potency was 14.98 +/- 2.23%, which is substantially lower than recent reports summarizing dispensary reported THC potency. The average observed THC potency was 23.1% lower than the lowest label reported values and 35.6% lower than the highest label reported values. Overall, ~70% of the samples were more than 15% lower than the THC potency numbers reported on the label, with three samples having only one half of the reported maximum THC potency. Although the exact source of the discrepancies is difficult to determine, a lack of standardized testing protocols, limited regulatory oversight, and financial incentives to market high THC potency likely play a significant role. Given our results it is urgent that steps are taken to increase label accuracy of Cannabis being sold to the public. The lack of accurate reporting of THC potency can have impacts on medical patients controlling dosage, recreational consumers expecting an effect aligned with price, and trust in the industry as a whole. As the legal cannabis market continues to grow, it is essential that the industry moves toward selling products with more accurate labeling.

Funder

Headspace Sensory LLC

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference60 articles.

1. U.S. Department of Justice: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Diversion control division, drug & chemical evaluation section. Lists of: scheduling actions controlled substances regulated chemicals. 2021. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/orangebook/orangebook.pdf

2. Lawson K. Calling It ‘Cannabis’ instead of ‘marijuana’ doesn’t boost legalization support, study finds. Marijuana Moment. 2019. https://www.marijuanamoment.net/calling-it-cannabis-instead-of-marijuana-doesnt-boost-legalization-support-study-finds/

3. Has the “M” word been framed? Marijuana, cannabis, and public opinion;RA Mikos;PloS One,2019

4. Comparative Genetic Structure of Cannabis sativa Including Federally Produced, Wild Collected, and Cultivated Samples;AL Schwabe;Frontiers in Plant Science,2021

5. DISA. Map of marijuana legality by state. DISA Global Solutions. 2022. https://disa.com/map-of-marijuana-legality-by-state.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3