Abstract
The authenticity of political candidates receives increasing attention in political and academic discourse. Although being perceived as authentic is seen as a success factor in contemporary political communication, little attention has been paid to how citizens evaluate politicians’ authenticity. The state of research thus lacks a valid instrument to measure citizens’ perceptions of politicians’ authenticity. This article addresses this gap in the literature and proposes a new multidimensional scale of perceived political authenticity. We conducted three consecutive studies to test the instrument’s composition, performance, and validity and present a final 12-item scale. Results from an expert panel and two online quota surveys (Sample 1:N= 556, Sample 2:N= 1,210) show that citizens rely on three political authenticity dimensions to judge politicians’ authenticity: ordinariness, consistency, and immediacy. Factor analyses were used to establish construct validity and demonstrate that the new scale is a robust and reliable measure. Finally, we find that higher perceived political authenticity for specific politicians is positively associated with party identification and the intention to vote for politicians.
Funder
German Research Foundation
Open Access Publication Fund of the Thueringer Universitaets- und Landesbibliothek Jena
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference64 articles.
1. The Good Politician
2. The good politician and political trust: An authenticity gap in British politics.;VO Valgarðsson;Political Studies.,2020
3. Authenticity in political discourse;B. Jones;Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,2016
4. Political authenticity: Conceptualization of a popular term.;SM Luebke;The International Journal of Press/Politics,2021
5. The politics of authenticity in presidential campaigns, 1976–2008.;EJ Seifert;Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Co,2012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献