Abstract
Introduction
Abortion is a common gynecological procedure and plays a central role in women’s health and autonomy. To maintain accessibility to abortion, it is important that sufficient obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents intend to provide abortion care after residency. This study identifies factors that influence a resident’s intention to provide abortions (IPA) post-training.
Materials and methods
A multiple-choice survey, addressing demographics, religious background, residency program metrics, training experience and intent to provide abortions (IPA), was answered by 409 Ob/Gyn residents. Chi-square test was performed on descriptive statistics and continuous variables were tested with ANOVA with p<0.05 considered significant.
Results
Residents with IPA were predominantly female (p = 0.001), training in the Northeast and West (p<0.001), identifying either as non-religious, agnostic/atheist or Jewish (p<0.01), not actively practicing their religion (p<0.001) and leaning democrats (p<0.002). Those with IPA were more likely to train at hospitals without religious affiliation (p<0.008), to train at a Ryan Program (p<0.001), to place strong emphasis on choosing a program with family planning training (p<0.001), to join programs where a significant portion of the faculty performs abortions (p<0.001) and to have completed a higher number of first trimester medical and surgical abortion procedures during the last six months of training (p<0.001).
Conclusion
These results suggest that factors influencing a physician’s intention to provide abortions are multifactorial, involving personal and program factors. A model predicting IPA is derived. To maximize IPA, residency programs can increase abortion volume, facilitate additional training and build a supportive faculty.
Funder
NIH-Women’s Reproductive Health Research Career Development Award
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference26 articles.
1. Restricted access to abortion violates human rights, precludes reproductive justice, and demands a public health intervention [Internet]. 2015 [cited December 23, 2021]. http://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2016/01/04/11/24/restricted-access-to-abortion-violates-human-rights.
2. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 613: Increasing access to abortion;Obstet Gynecol,2014
3. Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011;LB Finer;N Engl J Med,2016
4. Unintended Pregnancy in the United States Fact Sheet [Internet]. 2019 [cited December 23, 2021]. https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/unintended-pregnancy-united-states.
5. Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008;RK Jones;Perspect Sex Reprod Health,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献