The long-term impact of the Leprosy Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (LPEP) program on leprosy incidence: A modelling study
-
Published:2021-03-31
Issue:3
Volume:15
Page:e0009279
-
ISSN:1935-2735
-
Container-title:PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Author:
Blok David J.ORCID, Steinmann PeterORCID, Tiwari AnujORCID, Barth-Jaeggi TanjaORCID, Arif Mohammad A.ORCID, Banstola Nand LalORCID, Baskota RabindraORCID, Blaney David, Bonenberger MarcORCID, Budiawan TekyORCID, Cavaliero ArielleORCID, Gani ZaahiraORCID, Greter HelenaORCID, Ignotti Eliane, Kamara Deusdedit V., Kasang ChristaORCID, Manglani Pratap R.ORCID, Mieras LiesbethORCID, Njako Blasdus F., Pakasi TiaraORCID, Saha Unnati R., Saunderson Paul, Smith W. Cairns S., Stäheli René, Suriyarachchi Nayani D.ORCID, Tin Maung Aye, Shwe Tin, van Berkel Jan, van Brakel Wim H.ORCID, Vander Plaetse BartORCID, Virmond MarcosORCID, Wijesinghe Millawage S. D.ORCID, Aerts AnnORCID, Richardus Jan HendrikORCID
Abstract
Background
The Leprosy Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (LPEP) program explored the feasibility and impact of contact tracing and the provision of single dose rifampicin (SDR) to eligible contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients in Brazil, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka and Tanzania. As the impact of the programme is difficult to establish in the short term, we apply mathematical modelling to predict its long-term impact on the leprosy incidence.
Methodology
The individual-based model SIMCOLEP was calibrated and validated to the historic leprosy incidence data in the study areas. For each area, we assessed two scenarios: 1) continuation of existing routine activities as in 2014; and 2) routine activities combined with LPEP starting in 2015. The number of contacts per index patient screened varied from 1 to 36 between areas. Projections were made until 2040.
Principal findings
In all areas, the LPEP program increased the number of detected cases in the first year(s) of the programme as compared to the routine programme, followed by a faster reduction afterwards with increasing benefit over time. LPEP could accelerate the reduction of the leprosy incidence by up to six years as compared to the routine programme. The impact of LPEP varied by area due to differences in the number of contacts per index patient included and differences in leprosy epidemiology and routine control programme.
Conclusions
The LPEP program contributes significantly to the reduction of the leprosy incidence and could potentially accelerate the interruption of transmission. It would be advisable to include contact tracing/screening and SDR in routine leprosy programmes.
Funder
Novartis Foundation
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|