Assessing factors influencing communities’ acceptability of mass drug administration for the elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Guyana

Author:

Niles Reza A.ORCID,Thickstun Charles R.,Cox HoraceORCID,Dilliott DanielORCID,Burgert-Brucker Clara R.ORCID,Harding-Esch Emma M.ORCID,Clementson NikitaORCID,Sampson AnnastaciaORCID,Alexandre Jean Seme,Morice Trejos Ana C.,Scholte Ronaldo G. Carvalho,Krentel AlisonORCID

Abstract

Background Guyana is one of four countries in the Latin American Region where lymphatic filariasis (LF) remains endemic. In preparation for the introduction of a new triple drug therapy regimen (ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole (IDA)) in 2019, an acceptability study was embedded within sentinel site mapping in four regions to assess mass drug administration (MDA) coverage and compliance, acceptability, and perceptions about treatment and disease. The results from this survey would inform the rollout of IDA in Guyana in 2019. Methods Data collection for the study occurred in August 2019, using a validated questionnaire administered by trained enumerators. Across all regions, a total of 1,248 participants were sampled by the Filarial Mapping team. Four-hundred and fifty-one participants aged over 18 years were randomly selected for participation in an expanded acceptability questionnaire. All data were captured in Secure Data Kit (SDK). Results Acceptability was measured using a mean acceptability score. Unadjusted mean scores ranged from 24.6 to 29.3, with 22.5 as the threshold of acceptability. Regional variation occurred across many indicators of interest: self-rated understanding about LF, mechanisms of LF transmission, LF drug safety and history of treatment during MDA. Region IV (Georgetown) recorded higher knowledge about LF, but lower compliance and acceptability. Number of pills was not perceived as a concern. Conclusion Acceptability of MDA was good across all four regions under study. Results from this study set a baseline level for key indicators and acceptability, from which the acceptability of IDA can be measured. Regional variations across indicators suggest that localized approaches should be considered for social mobilization and MDA delivery to capture these contextual differences.

Funder

pan american health organization

united states agency for international development

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference48 articles.

1. Lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis;MJ Taylor;The Lancet,2010

2. WHO. Lymphatic filariasis [Internet]. Lymphatic filariasis. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lymphatic-filariasis

3. The Emerging Story of Disability Associated with Lymphatic Filariasis: A Critical Review;LM Zeldenryk;PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2011

4. Socioeconomic burden of lymphatic filariasis in Georgetown, Guyana;E Tyrell;Trop Med Int Health,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3