In Authenticity, We Trust – The Influencing Functions and Behaviours of Aged Care Leaders to Bridge the Intention-Experience Disparity of Followers

Author:

Olley PhD RichardORCID

Abstract

Study Design: This paper is an output from a mixed methods study of aged care employees in which the quantitative results examining the effects of leadership style on organisational identification (OID) and job satisfaction (JS) of aged care employees populated the agenda for semi-structured interviews and the transcripts subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the influencing functions and relate them to associated influencing behaviours of authentic leaders to assist in reducing the intention-experience disparity (IED) found in the thematic analysis of the transcripts of semi-structured interviews of the study participants. Findings and Research Outcomes: Job burnout and organisational disengagement were prevalent in participants.  The researcher identified that while aged care leaders worked assiduously to engage their staff, an Intention-Experience Disparity (IED) was operating.  Leaders' influencing functions and behaviours are documented from the evidence-based literature and a conceptual model based on authentic leadership principles developed. Research Limitations/Implications: The research deployed quantitative measurements to determine the differences in responses to an on online questionnaire that deployed the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire™ (MLQ5X[Short]), the Identification with a Psychological Group Scale (IDPG) and the Measure of Job Satisfaction (MJS) and differences between responses from leaders and their raters between measured.  These differences were used to explore participants' lived experiences and how they made sense of their personal and social worlds at work.  In the quantitative study, there may be an overstatement of the strength of the relationship between variables among those motivated to participate in the study.  The qualitative study required the researcher to describe the research context thoroughly.  Those who wish to transfer the results of this study to a different context than aged care must judge the transferability of findings. 

Publisher

Australasian College of Health Service Management

Subject

Health Information Management,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3