The influence of classical philosophy on the transformation of economics and economic institutions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The influence of classical philosophy on the transformation of economics and economic institutions

Published:2020-11-23 Issue:4 Volume:13 Page:268-278
ISSN:2687-136X
Container-title:Entrepreneur’s Guide
language:
Short-container-title:Putevoditelʹ predprinimatelâ

Author:

Ryazanova G.¹

Affiliation:

1. State University of Management

Abstract

The author reveals the connection between philosophical and economic thought in the classical period. The influence of philosophy on political and economic aspects of national economy development in the pre–scientific and scientific periods is revealed. The features of philosophical and worldview concepts of classicism that reflect the specifics of the era are indicated. The analysis of the relationship between classical philosophy and Economics has shown the influence of spiritual and moral aspects of the epoch, transcendentalism, rationalism, and a apriorism on economic theories based on the mechanistic paradigm, the logic of economic laws, and clear and unambiguous provisions for the formation and development of economic institutions. A model is presented that reveals the interaction of economic institutions from the position of classical philosophy in terms of the individualistic concept of behavior of classical economic agents, the Institute of labor resources as the basis of value and wealth, balance as a key element of the self–regulating order and distribution of economic benefits, and other aspects.

Publisher

Publishing Agency Science and Education

Reference15 articles.

1. Anan’in O.I. Filosofiya i metodologiya e’konomicheskoj nauki. [Philosophy and methodology of economic science.] Filosofiya e’konomicheskoj nauki. – M.: FGAOUVO NIU VShE’. 2010. 71 S.

2. Gibadullin A.A., Ery’gin Yu.V. [Assessing the potential and determining prospects for the development of national economic activities within the framework of the Eurasian economic Union]. Ocenka potenciala i opredelenie perspektiv razvitiya nacional’ny’x vidov e’konomicheskoj deyatel’nosti v ramkax Evrazijskogo e’konomicheskogo soyuza. Vestnik SurGU. 2018. № 2(20). S. 52–57.

3. Dikix V.A. [Forecasting based on the results of different/time market opportunities of the resource base for investment and construction projects]. Prognozirovanie na osnove rezul’tatov raznovremenny’x ry’nochny’x vozmozhnostej resursnoj bazy’ dlya investicionno/stroitel’ny’x proektov. IGUPIT, Naukovedenie. № 2. Mart (2014).

4. Kamchatova E.Yu. [Intensity of the innovation field of dominant companies]. Napryazhennost’ innovacionnogo polya dominiruyushhix kompanij. Innovacii i investicii. 2014. № 6. S. 8–10.

5. Krotenko T.Yu., Brodov Yu.A. [Competitive potential of the organization]. Konkurentny’j potencial organizacii. V sbornike: Upravlenie social’no/ e’konomicheskim razvitiem regionov: problemy’ i puti ix resheniya. Sbornik nauchny’x statej 9/oj Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno/prakticheskoj konferencii. V 3/x tomax. 2019. S. 356–360.