Author:
Rathod Shanaya,Pallikadavath Saseendran,Graves Elizabeth,Rahman Mohammad M,Brooks Ashlea,Rathod Pranay,Bhargava Rachna,Irfan Muhammad,Aly Reham,Mohammad Saleh Al Gahtani Haifa,Salam Zahwa,Chau Steven Wai Ho,Paterson Theone S E,Turner Brianna,Gorbunova Viktoria,Klymchuk Vitaly,Phiri Peter
Abstract
A condition of exposure to multiple stressors resulting in a mixed clinical picture spanning conventional categories without meeting any of them in full, encompasses a risk for a list of comorbidities preventing appropriate prevention and treatment. New transformative transdiagnostic approaches suggest changes spanning conventional categories. They base their systems of classification on biomarkers as well as on brain structural and functional dysregulation as associated with behavioral and emotional symptoms. These new approaches received critiques for not being specific enough and for suggesting a few biomarkers for psychopathology as a whole. Therefore, they put the value of differential diagnosis at risk of avoiding appropriate derived prevention and treatment. Multiplicity of stressors has been considered mostly during and following catastrophes, without considering the resulting mixed clinical picture and life event concomitant stressors. We herewith suggest a new category within the conventional classification systems: The Complex Stress Reaction Syndrome, for a condition of multiplicity of stressors, which showed a mixed clinical picture for daily life in the post coronavirus disease 2019 era, in the general population. We argue that this condition may be relevant to daily, regular life, across the lifespan, and beyond conditions of catastrophes. We further argue that this condition may worsen without professional care and it may develop into a severe mental health disorder, more costly to health systems and the suffering individuals. Means for derived prevention and treatment are discussed.
Publisher
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
Reference33 articles.
1. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
2. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General's statement on IHR emergency committee on novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)
3. World Health Organization. Mental Health and COVID-19: Early evidence of the pandemic’s impact: Scientific brief. In (pp. 1-13): 2020. Mental Health and COVID-19: Early evidence of the pandemic’s impact: Scientific brief, 2 March 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/
4. No time for dilemma: mass gatherings must be suspended
5. Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献