Performance of the walking trail making test in older adults with white matter hyperintensities

Abstract

BACKGROUND Several studies have reported that the walking trail making test (WTMT) completion time is significantly higher in patients with developmental coordination disorders and mild cognitive impairments. We hypothesized that WTMT performance would be altered in older adults with white matter hyperintensities (WMH). AIM To explore the performance in the WTMT in older people with WMH. METHODS In this single-center, observational study, 25 elderly WMH patients admitted to our hospital from June 2019 to June 2020 served as the WMH group and 20 participants matched for age, gender, and educational level who were undergoing physical examination in our hospital during the same period served as the control group. The participants completed the WTMT-A and WTMT-B to obtain their gait parameters, including WTMT-A completion time, WTMT-B completion time, speed, step length, cadence, and stance phase percent. White matter lesions were scored according to the Fazekas scale. Multiple neuropsychological assessments were carried out to assess cognitive function. The relationships between WTMT performance and cognition and motion in elderly patients with WMH were analyzed by partial Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS Patients with WMH performed significantly worse on the choice reaction test (CRT) (0.51 ± 0.09 s vs 0.44 ± 0.06 s, P = 0.007), verbal fluency test (VFT, 14.2 ± 2.75 vs 16.65 ± 3.54, P = 0.012), and digit symbol substitution test (16.00 ± 2.75 vs 18.40 ± 3.27, P = 0.010) than participants in the control group. The WMH group also required significantly more time to complete the WTMT-A (93.00 ± 10.76 s vs 70.55 ± 11.28 s, P < 0.001) and WTMT-B (109.72 ± 12.26 s vs 82.85 ± 7.90 s, P < 0.001). WTMT-A completion time was positively correlated with CRT time (r = 0.460, P = 0.001), while WTMT-B completion time was negatively correlated with VFT (r = -0.391, P = 0.008). On the WTMT-A, only speed was found to statistically differ between the WMH and control groups (0.803 ± 0.096 vs 0.975 ± 0.050 m/s, P < 0.001), whereas on the WTMT-B, the WMH group exhibited a significantly lower speed (0.778 ± 0.111 vs 0.970 ± 0.053 m/s, P < 0.001) and cadence (82.600 ± 4.140 vs 85.500 ± 5.020 steps/m, P = 0.039), as well as a higher stance phase percentage (65.061 ± 1.813% vs 63.513 ± 2.465%, P = 0.019) relative to controls. CONCLUSION Older adults with WMH showed obviously poorer WTMT performance. WTMT could be a potential indicator for cognitive and motor deficits in patients with WMH.