Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to investigate McDonald’s Corporation and its social structure, environmental influence as well as it’s relationship between the modernist and postmodernist perspectives. The study attempted to discuss both the modernist and postmodernist perspectives as well as examined McDonald’s Corporation’s various technological innovation of food assembly to draw conclusions.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Data was collected mainly through literature review on both modernist and postmodernist theory in order to understand the complexity of organizational culture, operation and leadership followed by linking them with the management of McDonald’s Corporation. McDonald’s Corporation was chosen due to its global recognition and their management, marketing style along with profit and financial analysis that have been relevant to both scholars and practitioners.
Results: The result have supported and with a conclusion that McDonald’s Corporation, like other large organizations follows modernist approach in order to secure their efficiency in production and administration, but at the same time their marketing approach is more of a postmodernist in relations to their cuisine, hyper-reality in franchised restaurant.
Originality/Value: The current study is based mainly on modernist and postmodernist perspectives theories as well as secondary data collection from annual reports and peer reviewed scholarly articles of McDonald’s Corporation.
Publisher
Maya Global Education Society
Subject
General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference20 articles.
1. Arndt, F., 2010. Assessing dynamic capabilities: Mintzberg's school of thought. South African Journal of Business Management, 42(1).https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v42i1.484
2. Boje, D.M., 2006. What happened on the way to postmodern? Qualitative Research in Organization and Management Journal, 2006. New Mexico State University.
3. Cravens, D.W., M.J. Neely, N.F. Piercy and A. Baldauf, 2009. Management framework guiding strategic thinking in rapidly changing markets. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(1-2).Available at: 10.1362/02672579x4100025.https://doi.org/10.1362/026725709X410025
4. Esade, M.B. and B. McKelvey, 2010. Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: A complexity science bridge. Academy of Management Review, 35(3).https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.51142028
5. Hatch, M.J., 2006. Organizational theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. 2nd Edn., NY: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. THE NAMING OF ACEHNESE TRADITIONAL CULINARY;Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews;2020-05-05