DIFFERENCES OF SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS PRE-SERVICE TEACHER ON PHYSICS EDUCATION AND BIOLOGY EDUCATION

Author:

Maison ,Sulistioning Budiarti Retni,Christine Samosir Sofia,Ria Nasih Neng

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This study aims to determine the differences in the mastery of science process skills in experiment group students and control group students in basic physics practicum I in equilibrium material in physics education and biology education study programs. And to find out the description of the mastery of science process skills in the experiment and control group students in biology and physics education study programs. Methodology: This research is a quantitative research type quasy experiment with a static group comparison design. To determine the experiment class and the control class, both classes will be given a pre-test first. In the comparison group, researchers did not randomly select two groups to be given treatment with a posttest without a pre-test. The results of the mastery of students' science process skills will be analyzed by descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Main Findings: The results of this study show that there are differences in the mastery of science process skills between students using Science Process Skills-based practicum guide books inquiry models with students who use conventional practicum guidebooks in each study program. Based on statistical parameters, SPS mastery in the experiment class is better than in the control class. Applications of this study: This research can be used as input for the Physics Education Study Program at the Universitas Jambi to consider the use of SPS-based practicum guides. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this study aims to know the description and assessment of the mastery of SPS in the experiment group students and the control group students in the basic physics practicum in equilibrium material in biology education and physics education study programs in the use of science process skills-based practicum guides with inquiry models.

Publisher

Maya Global Education Society

Subject

General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities

Reference35 articles.

1. Adnyana, P. B., & Citrawathi, D. M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Question-Based Inquiry Module in Learning Biological Knowledge and Science Process Skills.International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education,12(8), 1871-1878.

2. Agustina, P., & Saputra, A. (2016). Analisis Keterampilan Proses Sains (KPS) Dasar Calon Mahasiswa Guru Biologi Pada Matakuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan (StudiKasusMahasiswa Prodi P. Biologi FKIP UMS TahunAjaran 2015/2016).Seminar NasionalPendidiknSains,71-78.

3. Arifin, Z., Silaban, R., &Tarigan, S. (2017). AnalisisBukuPanduanPraktikum Kimia Kelas 12 Semester GanjilBerdasarkanKurikulum 2013.IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education ,7(6), 61-65.

4. Asrial, et al, (2019).Identification: The Effect Of Mathematical Competence On Pedagogic Competency Of Prospective Teacher. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 85-92.

5. Effectivenes of Using E-Module and E-Assessment

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3