GENERALIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC VIEWS ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ESSENCE AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT “ORGANIZATION”

Author:

Gruzina Inna1,Pererva Ivanna1

Affiliation:

1. Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the article is generalization and systematization of scientific approaches to the interpretation of the concept of “organization” in order to understand its essence, content, patterns of functioning and development. Methodology of research. To achieve this goal, the following methods were used: a systematic approach – to summarize the main views of the authors on this issue; analytical – when working on literary and Internet sources; comparative – to compare the positions of the authors on the issues under study; graphic – for visual presentation of research results. Findings. It is proved that the diversity of scientific ideas and schools that study organizations is due to the peculiarities of the process of forming the theoretical basis for building an organization that took place at the intersection of different fields of knowledge – management, sociology, psychology and many others. There is a lack of a comprehensive theory that could fully explain all existing species, types and forms of organizational structures, to determine the processes that take place in them. There is some confusion in the interpretation and understanding of the term due to the ambiguity and versatility of the concept of “organization” as an object of study, the existence of different, sometimes contradictory, scientific approaches and tools to determine its content. The necessity of research of the organization in statics is as some integral formation, and in dynamics – as various processes on ordering of an element is proved. The distribution of views of scientists to study the organization as: groups of people – 37%, systems – 32%, processes – 18%, functions – 9%, states, phenomena, structures, ideas – 4% among the total number of researched scientific sources. Based on these results, the expediency of combining groups of the organization as a process and function into one general group is substantiated, because the function, in most cases, is considered as a consistent implementation of certain steps (actions, stages), i.e. as a process. This led to a regrouping of definitions of the organization in scientific sources: the organization as a system, including social – almost 69% of definitions; organization as a process – about 27%; organization as a state, phenomenon, structure or idea – about 4%. Originality. There was a further development of generalization of scientific approaches to the study of organizations, according to which almost 70% of professionals consider the organization as a system, which allowed to substantiate the need to use for its study the tools of a systems approach, which is a universal research method. Given that the organization, as the object of study, is a multifaceted category, the need to apply an integrated approach, which, in turn, is one of the main methodological principles of the systems approach. It is proved that this will allow through further research of the structure and basic elements of organizations, their characteristics, features and parameters, as well as functions, principles of operation and laws of behaviour, to systematize and classify organizations by a number of common features and develop effective management method. Practical value. The practical recommendations of the authors on the study of organizations through an integrated approach can be used to identify features of the construction and operation of modern organizations and develop effective methods of managing them. Key words: organization, process, system, function, state, organizational activity.

Publisher

Institute of Economics, Technologies and Entrepreneurship

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Antonenko, V.M., Mamchenko, S.D. and Rohushyna, Yu.V. (2016), Suchasni informatsiini systemy i tekhnolohii: upravlinnia znanniamy [Modern information systems and technologies: knowledge management], Nats. universytet DPS Ukrainy, Irpin, Ukraine, 212 p.

2. Batsenko, L.M., Halenin, R.V. and Andriienko, A.A. (2018), “Formation of modern theoretical provisions on the organization in the aspect of the development of management science”, Ekonomika i suspilstvo, no. 18, pp. 258-265, DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2018-18-36.

3. Honsor, O.Y. (2013), “Implementation CALS-technologies in the quality management system for agricultural enterprises”, Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”, no. 753, pp. 135-139.

4. Zavadskyi, Y.S. (2002), Menedzhment : pidruchnyk dlia stud. ekon. spets. vyshch. navchalnykh zakladiv [Management: a textbook for students. econ. special higher educational institutions], In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Publishing House of Europe. University, Kyiv, Ukraine, 640 p.

5. Zamyatin, A.Yu., Baygutlina, I.A. and Zamyatina, A.A. (2016), “Information technologies in the management of the corporation. Optimization of work of IT-divisions”, Menedzhment segodnya, no. 5, pp. 314-325.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3