TRANSFORMATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PUBLIC ECONOMY

Author:

Tymoshchuk Vasyl1

Affiliation:

1. Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University, Dnipro

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the article is to generalize the trends of the transformation of the institutional environment of the innovative development of the national economy and the features of the institutional support for the development of innovations. Methodology of research. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is: a systematic approach to the generalization of trends in the transformation of the institutional environment of innovative development; institutional approach to the substantiation of the elements of the regulatory influence of formal norms, oriented towards the development of innovations; structural and functional analysis – to determine the macroeconomic and microeconomic manifestation of post-industrial transformations on the institutional environment. Findings. It is emphasized that for the formation of an effective toolkit for innovative modernization of the national economy, it is important to take into account global factors of economic dynamics, their exogenous and endogenous manifestations. It was established that the modern vector of global transformations, which is already having an impact on the national economy, has become digital modernization, which radically changes the economic relationships of people and the fundamental role of economic resources. It is argued that digitalization generates effects that receive macroeconomic manifestation through the emergence and spread of new business strategies, changes in market conditions, and an increase in labour productivity. At the microeconomic level digitalization leads to a change in the structure and supply of goods production, their quality, logistics and sales conditions, and the interaction of manufacturers. Digital technologies contribute to the emergence of new institutions and institutes and influence existing ones by algorithmizing institutional influence and regulation, minimizing the impact of institutional traps and preventing the emergence of new ones, reducing the stability of existing routines, increasing or decreasing the effectiveness of institutions. Originality. It is substantiated that the post-industrial transformations of the economy and the institutional environment change the structural characteristics, but not the essential purpose of institutions and institutes in innovative development. The processes of digitalization and network interactions contribute to the standardization and algorithmization of institutes, the introduction of "digital institutes"; increase the efficiency of established institutes and institutions; create new dysfunctions due to the opportunistic behaviour of economic subjects; form an institutional "vacuum" due to the proliferation of digital technologies that have not yet become embedded in the institutional environment. In view of the task of innovative modernization of the public economy, in order to exclude the negative impact it is necessary to modernize the institutional environment itself to change the direction of the functional influence of regulatory norms and introduce organizational innovations that can improve the institutional structure. Practical value. The theoretical and methodological provisions of the study deepen the practical principles and tools of institutional regulation of innovative modernization of the national economy. Key words: modernization, innovative development, social economy, transformation, institutional regulation, institute, institution.

Publisher

Institute of Economics, Technologies and Entrepreneurship

Reference11 articles.

1. Hrytsenko, A.A. (Ed.). (2018), Vidtvoriuvalna dynamika ekonomichnykh system: instytuty ta diialnist [Reproductive dynamics of economic systems: institutions and activity], monograph, DU “Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrainy”, Kyiv, Ukraine, 524 p.

2. Heiets, V.M. (2016), “Institutes in the expansion of technological modernization of the economy of Ukraine”, Zhurnal yevropeiskoi ekonomiky, Vol. 15 (no. 3), pp. 255-265.

3. Hrazhevska, N.I. (2008), Ekonomichni systemy epokhy hlobalnykh zmin [The economic system of the era of global change], Znannia, Kyiv, Ukraine, 431 p.

4. Hrytsenko, A. (2021), “Research methodology of the transformation of economic functions of the state in the conditions of globalization”, Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 7, pp. 5-13.

5. Zabarna, E.M. (Ed.) (2019), Paradyhma innovatsiinoho rozvytku v umovakh rynkovoi transformatsii [The paradigm of innovative development in the conditions of market transformation], monograph, Kherson, Ukraine, 92 p.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3