1. 1. Krull, W. (2011). Bewertung, Begutachtung und Evaluation in Wissenschaft und Forschung. In Hornbostel, S., Schelling, A, (Hrsg.). Evaluation: New Balance of Power (iFQ Working Paper, 9), 15-23. Retrieved from https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/33626/ssoar-2011-hornbostel_et_al-Evaluation_new_balance_of_power.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-2011-hornbostel_et_al-Evaluation_new_balance_of_power.pdf.
2. 2. Fröhlich, G. (2003, Mai). Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Leistunge. Medizin - bibliothek - Information, 3 (2). Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/6653/1/10fragen29-32.pdf.
3. 3. Browman, H. I., Stergiou, K. I. (2008). Factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely. Inter-Research Science Publisher, 8, 1-3. Retrieved from https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/p1-3/.
4. 4. Jansen, D., Wald, A., Franke, K., Schmoch, U., Schubert, T. (2007, Mai). Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 59 (1), 125-149. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11577-007-0006-1.
5. 5. Weingart, P. (2005, January). Impact of Bibliometrics upon the Science System: Inadvertent Conse-quences? Scientometrics, 62 (1), 117-131. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7.