Author:
Dessidianti Rachma,Muzakky Fuad,Samlan Karima
Publisher
Atlantis Press International BV
Reference20 articles.
1. H. Théophile, M. André, G. Miremont-Salamé, Y. Arimone, and B. Bégaud, “Comparison of three methods (an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms) for the evaluation of routine pharmacovigilance case reports using consensual expert judgement as reference.,” Drug Saf., vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1033–1044, Oct. 2013
2. L. M. Khan, S. E. Al-Harthi, A.-M. M. Osman, M. A. A. A. Sattar, and A. S. Ali, “Dilemmas of the causality assessment tools in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions.,” Saudi Pharm. J. SPJ Off. Publ. Saudi Pharm. Soc., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 485–493, Jul. 2016.
3. S. K. Behera, S. Das, A. S. Xavier, S. Velupula, and S. Sandhiya, “Comparison of different methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.,” Int. J. Clin. Pharm., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 903–910, Aug. 2018
4. R. C. Hire, P. J. Kinage, and N. N. Gaikwad, “Review Article Causality Assessment in Pharmacovigilance : A Step Towards Quality Care,” SJAMS (Scholars J. Appl. Med. Sci., vol. 6691, no. 5, pp. 386–392, 2013.
5. B. E. Wiholm, “The Swedish drug-event assessment methods. Special workshop--regulatory.,” Drug Inf. J., vol. 18, no. 3–4, pp. 267–269, 1984.