A CRITICAL DEBATE ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF DIGITAL MEMORY
Abstract
Digital technologies have transformed the conventions of preserving, recalling, and forgetting the past as they provide new digital tools and platforms to remember, to forget and to collect data for individuals, societies, and corporations. With the convergence of new media, memory gains a global aspect along with its personal and local characteristics and turns into the digitally mediated memory. These technologies enable digital memory to be indexed, archived, circulated, and processed infinitely in cyberspace. Therefore, the advancements in the Web and cloud computing technologies yield new dimensions for memory studies to be discussed from a political economy perspective since digitally mediated memory has some economic, political, societal, and cultural impacts on societies.
This study conceptually scrutinizes the commodification processes of digital memory and analyzes its material and immaterial bases from a political economy perspective, and claims that they are fundamentally interwoven. The rare earths which are used to produce technological devices are considered as the material basis. Additionally, major technology corporations using these rare earths, and their data centers are taken as the extensions of its materiality. Digitally archived, managed, and retrieved memory is considered as data, which represent immaterial basis of digital memory. The materiality and immateriality of digital memory are not regarded as independent from the inherent power relations and ideologies of the current data economy. Thus, this study aims to discuss digital memory from a political economy perspective to reveal the flow between its materiality and immateriality and the inherent power relations in the data economy. It also poses the potential challenges, risks, and outcomes we may encounter in such an economic system.
Publisher
Galatasaray Universitesi Iletisim
Reference45 articles.
1. Abbate, J. (2000). Inventing the Internet. Massachusetts: MIT Press. 2. Assmann, A. and Conrad, S. (2010). (eds) Memory in a Global Age Discourses, Practices and Trajectories. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Berners-Lee, T., Cailliau, R., Loutonen, A, Nielsen, H., F., and Secret, A. (1994). The World-Wide Web. Communications of the ACM, 37(8), 76-82. 3. Brown, A., D., Gutman, Y., Freeman, L., Sodaro, A. and Coman, A. (2009) Introduction: Is an interdisciplinary field of memory studies possible? International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, Special Issue: Memory and Media Space, 22(2), 117-124. 4. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic, July 1945. Accessed 05 April 2020, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/
Casalegno, F. (2004). Thought on the convergence of digital media, memory, and social and urban spaces. Space and Culture, 7(3), 313–332. 5. Cattaneo, G., Micheletti, G., Glennon, M., La Croce, C., and Mitta, C. (2020). The European Data Market Monitoring Tool: Key Facts & Figures, First Policy Conclusions, Data Landscape And Quantified Stories, D2.9 Final Study Report- Executive Summary. Brussels: European Commision. Accessed 20 August 2022. https://datalandscape.eu/sites/default/files/report/D2.9_EDM_Executive_summary_ENG_16.06_rev_pdf.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Cognitive Processes in the Digital Realm;Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics;2024-04-05
|
|