Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Community-Based Socio-Ecological Approaches to Obesity Prevention Among Cooperative Extension Agents
-
Published:2021-03-01
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:2325-5226
-
Container-title:Journal of Human Sciences and Extension
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:jhse
Author:
Holson Denise1, Stroope Jessica1, Cater Melissa1
Affiliation:
1. Louisiana State University
Abstract
Perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes of Cooperative Extension Service (CES) Family and Consumer Science (FCS) agents related to the planning and implementation of community-based multi-level ecological obesity prevention strategies were identified through qualitative, exploratory research. Focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted in the five regions of the Louisiana State University CES (LSU AgCenter). Participants included CES FCS Extension agents (n = 35; 97% of agents). Participants were female and responsible for conducting programming in parishes (counties). Thematic analysis of data found principal factors that influenced FCS Extension agents’ perceived ability to plan and implement community-based multi-level obesity prevention approaches to include knowledge of the socio-ecological model, beliefs about roles of CES, funding, human resources, community connectedness, community buy-in, guidance, and internal support. Assessing what FCS agents perceived as barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based obesity prevention approaches provided valuable direction to the state FCS office. Understanding gaps in knowledge, professional development needs, and existing strengths will help make the transition to community-based obesity prevention initiatives more effective. These findings may be beneficial to other CES and public health agencies implementing multi-level, community-based obesity prevention programs in partnership with community coalitions.
Publisher
Mississippi State University Libraries - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS
Reference34 articles.
1. Anderson, L. M., Adeney, K. L., Shinn, C., Safranek, S., Buckner‐Brown, J., & Krause, L. K. (2015). Community coalition‐driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2. Braun, B., Bruns, K., Cronk, L., Fox, L. K., Koukel, S., Rice, C., Rodgers, M., Samuel, J., Vail, A., & Warren, T. (2014). National framework for health and wellness (p. 23). Report prepared for the National Institute of Food and Agriculture. https://nifa.usda.gov/resource/national-framework-health-and-wellness 3. Carter, W. M. (2019). Improving physical activity and outdoor recreation in rural Alabama through community coalitions. Preventing Chronic Disease, 16. 4. Coenen, M., Stamm, T. A., Stucki, G., & Cieza, A. (2012). Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A comparison of two qualitative methods. Quality of Life Research, 21(2), 359–370. 5. Crosby, R., & Noar, S. M. (2011). What is a planning model? An introduction to PRECEDE-PROCEED. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71(s1), S7–S15.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|