Affiliation:
1. Maryville College
2. University of Tennessee
Abstract
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to understand the perceptions Extension professionals have about healthy food retail programs (HFRPs). Family and Consumer Science (FCS) agents from one state in the southeastern United States were interviewed about their definitions of HFRPs, what challenges and benefits existed, and strategies for successful HFRP implementation. Participants reported that HFRPs would bring immense benefits to their communities, including expanding the recognition of Extension. However, one specific suggestion that was identified was hands-on training needed before initiating HFRPs, particularly on strategies for relationship development with retail store owners.
Publisher
Mississippi State University Libraries - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS
Reference42 articles.
1. Adam, A., & Jensen, J. D. (2016). What is the effectiveness of obesity related interventions at retail grocery stores and supermarkets? A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 16(1), Article 1247.
2. Anderson-Steeves, E., Grier-Welch, A., Sweet, C., McIver, K., Sneed, C. T., Franck, K. L., Bower, L., & Burney, J. L. (2019, November 2-6). Process evaluation of the Shop Smart Tennessee intervention to increase access and demand for healthier, staple food items in convenience stores in low-income, rural Appalachian communities [Conference presentation]. American Public Health Association Annual Meeting and Expo, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Ammerman, A. S., Hartman, T., & DeMarco, M. M. (2017). Behavioral economics and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Making the healthy choice the easy choice. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(2), S145–S150.
4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–195.
5. Bellows, A. C., & Hamm, M. W. (2003). International effects on and inspiration for community food security policies and practices in the USA. Critical Public Health, 13(2), 107–123.