ADVANTAGES OF LATERAL INJECTION OF HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

Author:

KOZLOVSKA I.U.1,DATSIUK O.I.1

Affiliation:

1. Vinnytsia National Pyrogov memorial Medical University, Ukraine

Abstract

Abstract. The use of spinal anesthesia is the most frequent method of analgesia, therefore prolonging the duration of anesthesia and increasing its safety is a priority during operations on the lower extremities. The aim of the study: to extend the duration of the sensory block during spinal anesthesia, ensuring its safety for the patient. Materials and methods. To conduct the study, we analyzed the use of spinal anesthesia during surgical interventions in traumatology and orthopedics in 50 patients, divided into two study groups. The 1st research group (control) included 25 patients (18 men, 7 women) who underwent spinal anesthesia with the recommended graded dose of local anesthetic according to the patient's height, followed by supine position for up to 20 minutes. The II study group included 25 patients (17 men, 8 women) who underwent spinal anesthesia with a dose of local anesthetic determined by the height of the patient, followed by lateral position for up to 20 minutes. The results. The duration of the sensory block in patients of the I group was 252.2±74.32 min., and in the II – 299.2±62.44 min. respectively (р = 0.0193). During the assessment of SBP and heart rate in both study groups, a decrease in mean arterial pressure and heart rate after spinal anesthesia was determined, which was more pronounced during spinal anesthesia with subsequent application to the back. The volume of crystalloid infusion therapy during surgery was compared in both study groups. In patients of the I group, it was 2042±663.9 ml, and in the II group – 2028±600.36 ml. (p=0.938, the comparison was made according to the Student's test). The frequency of use of phenylephrine (for correction of hypotension with SBP < 65 mmHg) in the I group was 0.092±0.016 ml, in the II group – 0.004±0.002 ml. (p – 0.018, the comparison was carried out according to the Mann-Whitney test). Atropine sulfate was used to correct bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats/min), in group I – 0.16±0.031 ml, in group II – 0.14±0.034 ml. (p – 0.587, the comparison was carried out according to the MannWhitney test). Conclusions. 1. Selection of the dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine depending on the height of the patient ensures the necessary effectiveness of spinal anesthesia. 2. The duration of motor and sensory blockade is significantly higher by 16 % in the group with the lateral position of the patient. 3. When using a hyperbaric local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia in the lateral position, the frequency of cardiovascular complications decreases compared to the control group

Publisher

Association of Anesthesiologists of Ukraine

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference7 articles.

1. О.М. Хвисюк, В.С. Фесенко, М.І. Завеля, О.М. Хвисюк. Анестезія в ортопедії та травматології (операційне й позаопераційне знеболювання, лікувальні блокади), Харків, 2006. – 447 с.

2. Козловська І.Ю. Градаційне дозування місцевого анестетика для проведення спінальної анестезії при ортопедо-травматологічних операціях на нижніх кінцівках. Медицина невідкладних станів, Том 19, №2, 2023, Ст 39-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.22141/2224-0586.19.2.2023.1562

3. 1.Bromage PR. A Comparison of the Hydrochloride and Carbon Dioxide Salts of Lidocaine and Prilocaine in Epidural Analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica [Internet]. 1965Sep.1;9(s16):55-69. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1965.tb00523.x

4. Козловська І., Дацюк О. Оптимізація дозування гіпербаричного анестетика для унілатеральної спінальної анестезії при ортопедо-травматологічних операціях. Pain, anaesthesia & intensive care, (1(102), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.1(102).2023.278308

5. Глумчер Ф.С., Трещинский А.И. Руководство по анестезиологии: Учебное пособие.- К.: Медицина, 2008, – 608с.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3