Modelling a full scale membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No.1: challenges and solutions

Author:

Delrue F.12,Choubert J. M.3,Stricker A. E.3,Spérandio M.4,Mietton-Peuchot M.2,Racault Y.1

Affiliation:

1. Cemagref, UR REBX, 50 avenue de Verdun, F-33612 Cestas Cedex, France E-mail: florian.delrue@cemagref.fr; anne-e.stricker@cemagref.fr; yvan.racault@cemagref.fr

2. Université Bordeaux 2, ISVV, UMR Œnologie, 351, cours de la Libération, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France E-mail: martine.mietton-peuchot@u-bordeaux2.fr

3. Cemagref, UR QELY, 3 bis quai Chauveau—CP220, F-69336 Lyon Cedex 09, France E-mail: jean-marc.choubert@cemagref.fr

4. INSA Toulouse, 135 avenue de Rangueil, F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 04, France E-mail: mathieu.sperandio@insa-toulouse.fr

Abstract

A full-scale membrane bioreactor (1,600 m3 d−1) was monitored for modelling purposes during the summer of 2006. A complete calibration of the ASM1 model is presented, in which the key points were the wastewater characterisation, the oxygen transfer and the biomass kinetics. Total BOD tests were not able to correctly estimate the biodegradable fraction of the wastewater. Therefore the wastewater fractionation was identified by adjusting the simulated sludge production rate to the measured value. MLVSS and MLSS were accurately predicted during both calibration and validation periods (20 and 30 days). Because the membranes were immerged in the aeration tank, the coarse bubble and fine bubble diffusion systems coexisted in the same tank. This allowed five different aeration combinations, depending whether the 2 systems were operating separately or simultaneously, and at low speed or high speed. The aeration control maintained low DO concentrations, allowing simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. This made it difficult to calibrate the oxygen transfer. The nitrogen removal kinetics were determined using maximum nitrification rate tests and an 8-hour intensive sampling campaign. Despite the challenges encountered, a calibrated set of parameters was identified for ASM1 that gave very satisfactory results for the calibration period. Matching simulated and measured data became more difficult during the validation period, mainly because the dominant aeration configuration had changed. However, the merit of this study is to be the first effort to simulate a full-scale MBR plant.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3