Enhanced forecasting of multi-step ahead daily soil temperature using advanced hybrid vote algorithm-based tree models

Author:

Hatamiafkoueieh Javad1,Heddam Salim2ORCID,Khoshtinat Saeed3,Khazaei Solmaz4,Osmani Abdol-Baset5,Nohani Ebrahim6,Kiomarzi Mohammad3,Sharafi Ehsan3,Tiefenbacher John7

Affiliation:

1. a Department of Mechanics and Control Processes, Academy of Engineering, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Str. 6, Moscow 117198, Russian Federation

2. b Faculty of Science, Agronomy Department, University 20 Août 1955 Skikda, Route El Hadaik, BP 26, Skikda, Algeria

3. c Department of Water Science, Urmia Municipality, Urmia, Iran

4. d Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Hydraulic structures, The Institute of Higher Education of Bonyan, Shahinshahr, Isfahan, Iran

5. e Agricultural Organization, Kurdistan Branch, Kurdistan, Iran

6. f Material and Energy Research Center, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran

7. g Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA

Abstract

Abstract In this study, the vote algorithm used to improve the performances of three machine-learning models including M5Prime (M5P), random forest (RF), and random tree (RT) is developed (i.e. V-M5P, V-RF, and V-RT). Developed models were tested for forecasting soil temperature (TS) at 1, 2, and 3 days ahead at depths of 5 and 50 cm. All models were developed using different climatic variables, including mean, minimum, and maximum air temperatures; sunshine hours; evaporation; and solar radiation, which were evaluated. Correlation coefficients of 0.95 for the V-M5P model, 0.95 for the V-RF model, and 0.91 for the V-RT model were recorded for both 1- and 2-day ahead forecasting at a depth of 5 cm. For 3-day ahead forecasting, V-RF was the superior model with Nash–Sutcliff efficiency (NSE) values of 0.85, compared to V-M5P's value of 0.81 and V-RT's value of 0.81. The results at a depth of 5 cm indicate that V-RT was the least effective model. At a depth of 50 cm, forecasted TsS was in good agreement with measurements, and the V-RF was slightly superior. Among the limitations of the current work is that the models were unable to improve their performances by increasing the forecasting horizon.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Civil and Structural Engineering,Water Science and Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3