A bridge over troubled water – public participation as a possibility for success in water management

Author:

Carlander Anders1,von Borgstede Chris2,Jagers Sverker34,Sundblad Eva-Lotta5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology and Center for Finance, School of Business, Economics, and Law, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 500, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

2. Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 500, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

3. Political Science Unit, ETS, Luleå University of Technology, SE-971 87 Luleå, Sweden

4. Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 711, SE-405 Gothenburg, Sweden

5. Swedish Institute for the Marine Environment, P.O. Box 260, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

Public participation in local water councils is one method to involve different actors in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. In this study we investigate which beliefs explain why the public participate and also how motives to participate are related to willingness to comply with decisions related to the water management framework. In total 910 respondents answered a web survey regarding their participation in the council work. Structural equation modelling was conducted with willingness to comply and motives to participate as the main dependent latent constructs. Other included latent constructs were perceived need for change, fairness, trust, and social and personal norms. The results show that motives to participate did not have an effect on willingness to comply. Perceived need for change had indirect effects on nearly all latent constructs in the model, and personal norms and social norms (through personal norms) had an effect on willingness to comply. The results are discussed in the context of water management methods.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference89 articles.

1. Can Liberal Democracy Survive the Environmental Crisis? Sustainability, Liberal Neutrality and Overlapping Consensus;Achterberg,1993

2. The theory of planned behavior;Ajzen;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991

3. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of proenvironmental behaviour;Bamberg;Journal of Environmental Psychology,2007

4. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions;Beierle;Risk Analysis,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3