Factors affecting sanitation coverage in three income levels and potential toward achieving SDG 6.2

Author:

Bankole Abayomi Oluwatobiloba12ORCID,James Abraham Olamilekan13ORCID,Odjegba Enovwo Erere2ORCID,Bankole Afolashade Racheal12ORCID,Emmanuel Babajide I.13ORCID,Fiore Fabiana A.4ORCID,Pu Jaan H.5ORCID,Moruzzi Rodrigo14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Bauru Campus, Sao Paulo, Brazil

2. b Department of Water Resources Management and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria

3. c Department of Environmental Management and Toxicology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria

4. d Departmento de Engenharia Ambiental, Instituto de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Sao Jose dos Campos (UNESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil

5. e Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK

Abstract

Abstract An equitable sanitation coverage promotes sustainability, economic prosperity, and public health protection. This study examined factors affecting sanitation coverage and the potential of selected countries across three income levels (Low-Income, Lower-Middle, and Upper-Middle Income Countries) to meet Sustainable Development Goal 6.2 by developing a Sanitation Coverage Index (SCI). Nine developing countries were selected based on the following sets of criteria: income level, population, and geographical region. Twenty years (2000–2020) of sanitation coverage data were extracted from the JMP database and visualized. The SCI was developed using the service level criteria and examined the local drivers of poor sanitation coverage. Findings show that all countries studied made good progress and have commendable current status, except Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Nigeria. Nigeria has the highest open defecation coverage and may not meet the 2030 target. The SCI result shows that Turkey, Ukraine, and China have excellent coverage (scoring: 44, 43, and 40). Brazil, Bangladesh, and DPR Korea have satisfactory performances (36, 31, and 31), while Nigeria, Rwanda, and Ethiopia recorded unsatisfactory progress (28, 27, and 16). The strongest factors influencing poor coverage include population, high socioeconomic inequalities, and socio-political challenges. Therefore, the institutionalization of minimum acceptable standards, adequate sensitization, and funding could improve sanitation coverage in the countries assessed.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference97 articles.

1. Aquaya (2019a). Sanitation Policies, Practices and Preferences in Rangpur, Bangladesh. Aquaya Institute.

2. Aquaya (2019b). Sanitation Policies, Practices and Preferences in Kisumu, Kenya. Aquaya Institute.

3. Aquaya (2019c). Sanitation Policies, Practices and Preferences in Kumasi, Ghana. Aquaya Institute.

4. Aquaya (2019d). Sanitation Policies, Practices and Preferences in Nakuru, Kenya. Aquaya Institute.

5. Access to improved water and sanitation in sub-Saharan Africa in a quarter century

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3