Affiliation:
1. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Branch, National Water Research Institute, Environment Canada, CCIW, P.O.Box 5050, Burlington, Ontario
Abstract
Abstract
Pore water samples obtained by squeezing, centrifuging followed by filtration, and in situ dialysis were compared. The effects of the three methods on the measured concentrations of eight elements (Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Si and Sr) were studied. Iron and Mn proved to be extremely sensitive to oxygen exposure. Immediate centrifugation followed by filtration under nitrogen yield very similar results for almost all the elements as the in situ dialysis technique. The squeezing technique was the most susceptible to handling variables such as pressure-, oxygen- and temperature-related changes. Whenever possible, we recommend the use of in situ techniques that minimize the sampling artifacts. However, the choice of the technique for sampling sediment pore water should be dictated by the objectives of the study.
Subject
Water Science and Technology
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献