Affiliation:
1. Institute of Environmental Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
2. Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, 711, Taiwan
Abstract
Six methods, QiAamp DNA Mini Kit (Q), Q with Sepharose 4B gel column (Q/G), Q with low melting point agarose (Q/L), freeze-thaw/phenol-chloroform lysis (FT-PC), FT-PC/G, and FT-PC/L, were evaluated for their ability to isolate DNA of sufficient quality to quantify Legionella using qPCR. Samples of mixing Legionella pneumophila (ATCC33152) and humic acid (HA, 0–126.8 mg/l) were treated by the six methods. Q, Q/G, Q/L, FT-PC/G, and FT-PC/L removed HA from 1.9–126.8 to <1 mg/l determined by A260 with a spectrophotometer. Q obtained the highest DNA yield, followed by Q/G. Dilution (10- to 100-fold) of DNA arising from extraction using Q, Q/G, FT-PC, or FT-PC/G prevented qPCR inhibition. The highest recovery of cells was found in DNA extracted by Q and diluted 100-fold, and followed by Q/G. The applicability of Q and Q/G with dilution was further validated with cooling tower waters. Q or Q/G with 10-fold dilution increased L. pneumophila detection, whereas 100-fold dilution obtained the highest cell concentrations. Similar results were found for Legionella spp. except that both 10- and 100-fold dilutions increased cell concentrations. Thus, Q with 10-fold dilution is suggested to detect and quantify Legionella spp. and detect L. pneumophila. For L. pneumophila-positive samples, 100-fold diluted DNA must be re-analyzed to accurately quantify L. pneumophila.
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献