A critical review of multicriteria decision analysis practices in planning of urban green spaces and nature-based solutions

Author:

Bousquet Morgane1ORCID,Kuller Martijn2ORCID,Lacroix Sandrine3,Vanrolleghem Peter A.1

Affiliation:

1. a modelEAU, Département de génie civil et génie des eaux, Université Laval, Pavillon Adrien-Pouliot, 1065 avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada

2. b Faculty of Geosciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

3. c Department of Civil, Geological, and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3A7, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Green spaces and nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly considered by land-use planning policies to respond to the multiple challenges related to sustainable development. The multiple benefits brought by NBS make the use of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) essential to optimally balance their use. MCDA offers a catalog of methods allowing to structure problems with multiple objectives and to help adopt the optimal solution. However, NBS planning is a recent discipline and research is still ongoing to make this practice more common. We carried out a critical literature review on MCDA-NBS tools and practices, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method on the Web of Science database. We selected 124 papers on the subject between 2000 and 2022. We present a state-of-the-art MCDA approach for NBS and green space planning by looking at where these practices are applied, why and how this process is conducted, and who is involved in it. We found that studies are usually conducted in the global North on a single case study with the help of experts involved in the criteria weighting phase and the help of GIS MCDA tools often integrating a direct ranking method or the AHP method.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Reference183 articles.

1. Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights;Ambio,2021

2. How do multi-criteria assessments address landscape-level problems? A review of studies and practices;Ecological Economics,2017

3. Recommendations for online elicitation of swing weights from citizens in environmental decision-making;Operations Research Perspectives,2020

4. A review of the development of the multiple use forest management planning concept;International Forestry Review,2018

5. A framework for group decision using a MCDA model: Sharing, aggregating or comparing individual information?;Journal of Decision Systems,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3