Fighting for water in South Africa: public participation, water rights claiming and strengthening governance

Author:

Masiangoako Thato1ORCID,Khunou Kelebogile1ORCID,Potter Alana2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research and Advocacy, Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa, 6th Floor Aspern House, 54 De Korte Street, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, Gauteng 2001, South Africa

2. Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa, 6th Floor Aspern House, 54 De Korte Street, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, Gauteng 2001, South Africa

Abstract

Abstract Communities in South Africa employ a diverse range of strategies to actively claim their right to water. This paper examines two rights claiming strategies – protest and litigation – through the lens of two case studies. The first case study examines the struggles of the residents of Makhanda, a small town in the predominantly rural Eastern Cape Province, who formed a coalition to advocate for the dissolution of the municipal council for failing to fulfil its constitutional mandate to provide basic services. The second case examines the struggles of the residents of Marikana, an informal settlement in the City of Cape Town, where residents are forced to live in unlit, unhygienic and undignified conditions as a result of inadequate services provision. Although access to water is a justiciable right in South Africa, there is a curious paucity of legal rights mobilisation, with only one court case reaching the Constitutional Court. The article presents the following findings. First, communities employ different methods to claim their water rights, including engagement with government through formal channels, mobilisation, protest, litigation and self-supply. Water is a justiciable human right. Second, litigation is a valuable component of rights-claiming but is most effective if used alongside other strategies like community organisation and protest. Third, water rights can be achieved alongside struggles to secure other rights, like the right to housing, or holding local government accountable. In the two case studies, the legal tools of land expropriation and provincial intervention were employed to indirectly gain access to water services. Finally, community mobilisation, combined with strategic partnerships, plays a critical role in sustaining long-term efforts to claim water rights.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Water Science and Technology

Reference80 articles.

1. Rebellion of the poor: South Africa's service delivery protests – a preliminary analysis;Review of African Political Economy,2010

2. Alexander P. , RuncimanC. & NgwaneT.2014Community Protests 2004–2013. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqwBSNBMPCU

3. Frequency and turmoil: South Africa's community protests 2005–2017;South African Crime Quarterly,2018

4. Black's Law Dictionary 1990 Public Interest Litigation.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3