Impact of different recirculation schemes on nitrogen removal and overall performance of a laboratory scale MBR

Author:

Bracklow U.1,Manigas L.2,Drews A.3,Vocks M.4,Barjenbruch M.1,Kraume M.3

Affiliation:

1. Dept. of Urban Water Management TIB 1B-16, TU Berlin, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, 13355 , Berlin, Germany (E-mail: ute.bracklow@tu-berlin.de; matthias.barjenbruch@tu-berlin.de)

2. Dept. of Geoengineering and Envir. Technol., University of Cagliari, Piazza d'Armi 1, 09123, Italy (E-mail: lmanigas@unica.it)

3. Dept. of Chemical Engineering MA5-7, TU Berlin, Str. des 17. Juni 135, 10624 , Berlin, Germany (E-mail: anja.drews@tu-berlin.de; matthias.kraume@tu-berlin.de)

4. Berlin Centre of Competence for Water, Cicerostr. 24, 10709 , Berlin, Germany (E-mail: martin.vocks@kwb.de)

Abstract

For membrane bioreactors (MBR) with enhanced nutrients removal, rather complex recirculation schemes based on the biological requirements are commonly recommended. The aim of this work was to evaluate other recirculation options. For a laboratory scale MBR, four different recirculation schemes were tested. The MBR was operated with COD degradation, nitrification, post-denitrification without carbon dosing and biological phosphorus removal. For all configurations, efficient COD, nitrogen and phosphorus removal could be achieved. There were no big differences in elimination efficiency between the configurations (COD elimination: 96.6–97.9%, nitrogen removal: 89.7–92.1% and phosphorus removal: 97.4–99.4%). Changes in the degradation, release and uptake rates were levelled out by the changes in contact time and biomass distribution. With relatively constant outflow concentrations, different configurations are still interesting with regard to oxygen consumption, simplicity of plant operation or support of certain degradation pathways such as biological phosphorus removal or denitrification.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Environmental Engineering

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3