Citizen deliberation in the context of Uruguay's first National Water Plan

Author:

Lázaro Marila12,Bortagaray Isabel3,Trimble Micaela4,Zurbriggen Cristina5

Affiliation:

1. Science and Development Unit, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

2. Centre for Global Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

3. Institute for Sustainable Development, Innovation and Social Inclusion (IDIIS, for its name in Spanish), Northeast Regional University Centre, Universidad de la República, Tacuarembó, Uruguay

4. South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies (SARAS), Bella Vista-Maldonado, Uruguay

5. Political Science Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay

Abstract

Abstract As part of the formulation of the first National Water Plan (NWP) in Uruguay, a mini-public process called ‘Citizen Deliberation on Water (Deci Agua)’ was developed in 2016. While the draft of the plan was being discussed in the formal arenas of water governance (Basin Commissions and Regional Water Resources Councils), a University research team (led by the authors), in coordination with the national water authority, adapted the mechanism of consensus conferences in order to incorporate the citizens’ visions and to contribute to public understanding of the NWP challenges. This article analyses the main aspects of the developed participation strategy and discusses them regarding a set of quality criteria used to evaluate deliberative processes. Although the final version of the NWP (passed by decree in 2017) incorporated some of the contributions of the Citizen Panel, an in-depth analysis of the scope of the deliberative process of Deci Agua allows us to delve into some key aspects related to the quality of participation processes and the challenges. A mixed approach that combines stakeholder participation and lay citizens is novel and desirable in water governance since it increases the scope of participation, deepens the legitimacy of decision-making and improves the public debate.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference51 articles.

1. Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making

2. Towards a new era of deliberative mini-publics;Bächtiger,2014

3. Environmental politics after the deliberative turn;Bäckstrand,2010

4. Deliberative democracy and framing effects: why frames are a problem and how deliberative mini-publics might overcome them;Calvert,2014

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3