US Flood risk management in changing times

Author:

Baecher Gregory B.1ORCID,Galloway Gerald E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20472, USA

Abstract

Abstract The traditional regulatory and policy approach to flood risk in the US has been the optimization of benefits and costs, broadly mandated by federal policy. However, optimization may not be the best approach to flood risk management in light of the deep uncertainties we now face. A more incremental approach using a satisficing strategy may be. Flood risk is a function of the hydrologic factors that produce a hazard and the consequences of the hazard interfacing with the people and property exposed. Regretfully, both hydrologists and climatologists seem unable to provide the clairvoyant guidance needed by the water community facing major decisions on flood risk management in the coming years. As the seminal ‘Red Book’ noted, two things have become second nature to policy analysts and risk managers: absolute safety is unachievable, and it is necessary to distinguish between science and policy. The forcing elements and largest unknowns in determining risk rest with understanding the hydrologic factors involved in shaping the hazard.

Publisher

IWA Publishing

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference42 articles.

1. Risk, Surprises and Black Swans

2. CDC (2018). If the Material Uses Numeric Probability to Describe Risk, Is the Probability also Explained with Words or a Visual? | The CDC Clear Communication Index | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Center for Disease Control. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ccindex/tool/page-20.html (accessed January 11, 2020).

3. Confronting Deep Uncertainties in Risk Analysis

4. Eychaner J. H. (2015). Lessons from a 500-Year Record of Flood Elevations. Technical Report 7, Association of State Floodplain Managers, Madison, p. 25.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3