Efficacy Comparison of Some New Natural-Product Herbicides for Weed Control at Two Growth Stages

Author:

Abouziena Hussein F. H.,Omar Ahmad A. M.,Sharma Shiv D.,Singh Megh

Abstract

There is an urgent need to accelerate the development and implementation of effective organic-compliant herbicides that are environmentally safe and that help the producer meet increasing consumer demand for organic products. Therefore, greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of acetic acid (5%), acetic acid (30%), citric acid (10%), citric acid (5%) + garlic (0.2%), citric acid (10%) + garlic (0.2%), clove oil (45.6%), and corn gluten meal (CGM) compounds as natural-product herbicides for weed control. The herbicides were applied to the broadleaf weeds stranglervine, wild mustard, black nightshade, sicklepod, velvetleaf, and redroot pigweed and to narrowleaf weeds crowfootgrass, Johnsongrass, annual ryegrass, goosegrass, green foxtail, and yellow nutsedge. The herbicides were applied POST at two weed growth stages, namely, two to four and four to six true-leaf stages. CGM was applied PPI in two soil types. Citric acid (5%) + garlic (0.2%) had the greatest control (98%) of younger broadleaf weeds, followed by acetic acid (30%) > CGM > citric acid (10%) > acetic acid (5%) > citric acid (10%) + garlic (0.2%), and clove oil. Wild mustard was most sensitive to these herbicides, whereas redroot pigweed was the least sensitive. Herbicides did not control narrowleaf weeds except for acetic acid (30%) when applied early POST (EPOST) and CGM. Acetic acid (30%) was phytotoxic to all broadleaf weeds and most narrowleaf weeds when applied EPOST. Delayed application until the four- to six-leaf stage significantly reduced efficacy; acetic acid was less sensitive to growth stage than other herbicides. These results will help to determine effective natural herbicides for controlling weeds in organic farming.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science

Reference44 articles.

1. Weed Suppression by Deleterious Rhizobacteria is Affected by Formulation and Soil Properties

2. Webber C. L. III and Shrefler J. W. 2006. Corn gluten meal and spring-transplanted onions (Allium cepa L.): crop safety, weed control, and yields. Pages 87–97. in. National Allium Research Conference. College Station, TX Texas A&M.

3. [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture 2005. Economic Research Service: Organic Production Data Sets. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/Organic. Accessed: December 12, 2008.

4. Stopes C. and Millington S. 1991. Weed control in organic farming systems. Pages 185–192. in. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference. Brighton, UK Brighton Crop Production Council.

5. Smith R. 2006. Broccoli: Organic Weed Control Trials. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/filelibrary/1598/29476.pdf. Accessed: December 12, 2008.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3