Author:
Scroggs Derek M.,Miller Donnie K.,Griffin James L.,Steckel Lawrence E.,Blouin David C.,Stewart Alexander M.,Vidrine P. Roy
Abstract
Field studies were conducted 2004 and 2005 to evaluate weed control following POST applications of glyphosate in combination with eitherS-metolachlor (premix formulation), pyrithiobac, or trifloxysulfuron in conjunction with glyphosate in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton (Roundup Ready Flex). These herbicides were applied in combination with glyphosate in a two-application program at the 2-leaf (LF) (followed by glyphosate alone at the 10-LF growth stage), 6-LF (following glyphosate alone at the 2-LF growth stage), or 10-LF (following glyphosate alone at the 2-LF growth stage) cotton growth stages. No differences in weed control between residual herbicide were observed for goosegrass, hemp sesbania, Johnsongrass, Palmer amaranth, redroot pigweed, sicklepod, or smellmelon. Optimum control of barnyardgrass and browntop millet was achieved with glyphosate plusS-metolachlor. No differences were observed among application timings for control of goosegrass, hemp sesbania, Johnsongrass, pitted morningglory, and smellmelon. Control of barnyardgrass, browntop millet, Palmer amaranth, redroot pigweed, and sicklepod was optimized with residual herbicide application at the 2- or 10-LF timing. No yield differences were observed between residual herbicides, and seed cotton yield averaged 2,800 kg/ha. Yield was maximized when residual herbicide was applied at the 2- or 10-LF growth stage (2,960 to 2,730 kg/ha). Analysis based on numerical yield at particular residual-herbicide application timings and calculated yield for each timing based on the percentage of a standard three-application glyphosate program indicated the most consistent residual-herbicide timing for optimizing yield in a reduced-input Roundup Ready Flex weed-control program occurred at the two-leaf growth stage. All reduced-input programs, however, resulted in cotton yield of at least 93% of that obtained with the standard program.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Schraer S. M. , Cloud G. L. , Minton B. W. , Porterfield C. D. , Martin S. H. , Driver J. E. , Lunsford J. , Black D. L. , and Johnson M. 2002. Cotton response to CGA 362622: rates, timings, and tank-mixtures. Pages 13. in. the Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN National Cotton Council of America.
2. Robinson B. L. , Burke I. C. , Thomas W. E. , Clewis S. B. , and Wilcut J. W. 2003. CGA 362622, Cotoran and staple systems for weed control in cotton. Pages 28. in. the Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN National Cotton Council of America.
3. Mixtures of Glyphosate with CGA 362622 for Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献