A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia

Author:

Finley Caulfield Anna1,Rachabattula Shylaja1,Eyngorn Irina1,Hamilton Scott A.1,Kalimuthu Rajalakshmi1,Hsia Amie W.2,Lansberg Maarten G.1,Venkatasubramanian Chitra1,Baumann J. J.1,Buckwalter Marion S.1,Kumar Monisha A.3,Castle James S.4,Wijman Christine A. C.1

Affiliation:

1. Stanford Neurocritical Care Program, Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University School of Medicine Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA

2. Stroke Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA

3. Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

4. Department of Neurology, NorthShore University Health System, The University of Chicago, Evanston, IL 60201, USA

Abstract

Introduction. We sought to compare the performance of endovascular cooling to conventional surface cooling after cardiac arrest.Methods. Patients in coma following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were cooled with an endovascular cooling catheter or with ice bags and cold-water-circulating cooling blankets to a target temperature of 32.0–34.0C for 24 hours. Performance of cooling techniques was compared by (1) number of hourly recordings in target temperature range, (2) time elapsed from the written order to initiate cooling and target temperature, and (3) adverse events during the first week.Results. Median time in target temperature range was 19 hours (interquartile range (IQR), 16–20) in the endovascular groupversus. 10 hours (IQR, 7–15) in the surface group (P=.001). Median time to target temperature was 4 (IQR, 2.8–6.2) and 4.5 (IQR, 3–6.5) hours, respectively (P=.67). Adverse events were similar.Conclusion. Endovascular cooling maintains target temperatures better than conventional surface cooling.

Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Subject

Clinical Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3