RMS Risk Analysis when Using Multiple Hypothesis Testing Select Parameters of Thresholding under Conditions of Weak Dependence
-
Published:2024-06
Issue:2
Volume:48
Page:91-97
-
ISSN:0278-6419
-
Container-title:Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:MoscowUniv.Comput.Math.Cybern.
Reference9 articles.
1. V. A. Krylov, G. Moser, S. B. Serpico, and J. Zerubia, ‘‘False discovery rate approach to unsupervised image change detection,’’ IEEE Trans. Image Process. 25 (10), 4704–4718 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2016.2593340
2. O. Menyhart, B. Weltz, and B. Győrffy, ‘‘MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction,’’ PLoS One 16 (6), e0245824 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245824
3. F. Abramovich, Y. Benjamini, D. L. Donoho, and I. M. Johnstone, ‘‘Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate,’’ Ann. Stat. 34 (2), 584–653 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1214/009053606000000074
4. A. Farcomeni, ‘‘Some results on the control of the false discovery rate under dependence,’’ Scand. J. Stat. 34 (2), 275–297 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9469.2006.00530.x
5. M. O. Vorontsov and O. V. Shestakov, ‘‘Mean-square risk of the FDR procedure under weak dependence,’’ Inf. Primen. 17 (2), 34–40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14357/19922264230205