Ultrasensitive molecular tests for Plasmodium detection: applicability in control and elimination programs and reference laboratories

Author:

Aschar Mariana1,Sanchez Maria Carmen A.2,Costa-Nascimento Maria de Jesus3,Farinas Maria de Lourdes R. N.1,Hristov Angélica D.1,Lima Giselle F. M. C.1,Inoue Juliana1,Levi José E.2,Di Santi Silvia M.34

Affiliation:

1. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

2. Instituto de Medicina Tropical da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

3. Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo/Instituto de Medicina Tropical da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

4. santi@usp.br

Abstract

Objective.

To evaluate molecular tools to detect low-level parasitemia and the five species of Plasmodium that infect humans for use in control and elimination programs, and in reference laboratories.

Methods.

We evaluated 145 blood samples from patients who tested positive by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), from asymptomatic individuals and from the WHO Global Malaria Programme/United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service. Samples were assayed using the genus-specific RealStar® Malaria PCR Kit 1.0 (alt-Gen; altona Diagnostics) and the RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type PCR Kit (alt-S&T; altona Diagnostics). The results from the molecular tests were compared with those from quantitative PCR (qPCR), nPCR and thick blood smear.

Results.

The levels of parasitemia ranged from 1 to 518 000 parasites/µL, depending on the species. Compared with nPCR, alt-S&T had a sensitivity of 100%, except for identifying P. falciparum, for which the sensitivity was 93.94%. All samples positive by alt-Gen were also positive by nPCR. When comparing alt-Gen to qPCR, the sensitivity was 100% for P. vivax, P. malariae and P. falciparum. For all Plasmodium species, the correlation between cycle threshold values of alt-S&T and alt-Gen compared with qPCR was significant (P < 0.0001, Spearman’s test), with r = 0.8621 for alt-S&T and r = 0.9371 for alt-Gen. When all Plasmodium species were considered, there was a negative correlation between the level of parasitemia and real-time PCR cycle threshold values (P < 0.0001). In this study, only 2 of 28 samples from asymptomatic individuals were positive by thick blood smear; however, all 28 of these samples were positive by alt-S&T.

Conclusions.

The alt-Gen and alt-S&T assays are suitable for detecting submicroscopic infections for distinct epidemiological purposes, such as for use in surveys and reference laboratories, and screening in blood banks, which will contribute to global efforts to eliminate malaria.

Publisher

Pan American Health Organization

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference26 articles.

1. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: WHO; 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337660

2. Ministério da Saúde, Brasil; Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Boletim Epidemiológico: malária 2020 [Epidemiological Report – malaria 2020] Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais- de-conteudo/publicacoes/boletins/boletins-epidemiologicos-especiais/2020/boletim_especial_malaria_1dez20_final.pdf

3. Ministério da Saúde, Brasil; Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. “Dados para cidadão a partir da fonte de dados do Sivep-Malária e do Sinan, para notificações do Brasil de 2007 a 2021” [Public data from Sivep-Malaria and Sinan data sources, for notifications from Brazil from 2007 to 2021]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 29]. Available from: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/mal.ria.brasil/viz/Dadosparacidado_201925_03_2020/Incio

4. World Health Organization. Malaria microscopy quality assurance manual, version 2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204266

5. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/162441

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3