Affiliation:
1. City Clinical Hospital No. 1
2. Chita State Medical Academy
3. Regional Clinical Hospital of Chita
Abstract
Background. The rapid development of laparoscopic surgery can significantly reduce trauma during operations in the retroperitoneal space. These goals are also achieved by retroperitoneoscopy (RPS), which has become widespread in the last twenty years. The main difficulties for surgeons were associated with a small workspace and a lack of clear anatomical landmarks. Different access methods have different features, advantages and disadvantages, the analysis of which helps to optimize surgical treatment and accelerate patient rehabilitation.Aim: to study the advantages and disadvantages of retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal laparoscopic surgical methods of treatment.Materials and methods: We analyzed 305 case histories of patients operated on for various kidney diseases. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 – patients who underwent surgery using an extraperitoneal retroperitoneoscopic approach, Group 2 – patients who used the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. A comparison of two methods of surgical treatment of kidney diseases, retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic access, was carried out. The following indicators were compared: duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, need for analgesics, frequency of postoperative complications.Results. The duration of the operation with retroperitoneoscopic surgery was reduced by more than 15 % compared with the laparoscopic approach. Shorter periods of pain relief were required, and the number of complications also decreased. The duration of inpatient treatment did not differ significantly.Conclusion. Retroperitoneoscopic approach can be used as the method of choice for operations on the retroperitoneal space.
Subject
General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Reference12 articles.
1. Antonov AV. Extraperitoneal endovascular surgery access to the organs of the retroperitoneal space. Urologicheskie Vedomosti. 2012; 2(3): 35-41. (In Russ.).
2. Vrublevsky SG, Imanaliyeva AA, Shmyrov OS, Manzhos PI, Vrublevskaya EN. Prospects and possibilities of endovascular surgery of the retroperitoneal space. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2016; 20(1): 34-40. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18821/1560-9510-2016-20-1-34-40
3. Perlin DV. Simultaneous retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy with cholecystectomy. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2016; 18(3): 102-106. (In Russ.). doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2016-3-102-106
4. Kadyrov ZA. Our experience in the use of retroperitoneoscopy in the treatment of patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of the kidneys and retroperitoneal space. Healthcare of Tajikistan. 2017; 1(332): 33-38. (In Russ.).
5. Lobanov YuS, Efimov AV, Lobanov SL, Shapovalov KG. Influence of pneumoretroperitoneum on intra-abdominal pressure during operations in the retroperitoneal space. The Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2018; (2): 32-35. (In Russ.).