Assessment of the effectiveness of restrictive epidemic control measures using original models of cellular automaton

Author:

Karateev A. Yu.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

Background. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the human casualties caused by it, and the possibility of new epidemical threats make the search for effective countermeasures actual. One of the most effective tools, as the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic has shown, is restrictive measures of various types, which are especially significant with medical countermeasures being unavailable or insufficient. At the same time, the topic of restrictive measures and their mathematical modeling, especially given its importance, is not sufficiently disclosed in the scientific literature.The aim. To determine the possibility of assessing the effectiveness of restrictive epidemic control measures using original models of cellular automaton with intercellular boundaries.Methods. To determine the impact of restrictive measures on the dynamics of the daily increase in infected people, an original cellular automaton with intercellular boundaries was developed, which makes it possible to simulate epidemic control measures of varying stringency. In the simulations carried out using the Monte Carlo method with subsequent statistical processing, we studied the impact of restrictive measures of varying stringency on the number of infected people, the duration of the epidemic, and the quality of forecasting. The final series of experiments simulated the spread of the COVID-19 virus in Germany in the first half of 2020.The results show that even a simple cellular automaton model with boundaries successfully describes the course of the epidemic and allows us to assess the effectiveness of restrictive measures. The dependence of the daily increase in infected people on the stringency of measures is presented; it is shown what characteristics of the population can influence this dependence. It was found that the measures of medium stringency (40–50 % according to the Stringency Index) have the least predictable effect; they can cause both rapid localization of the focus and the spread of the epidemic to a large part of the population. Weak and strong measures give a more predictable effect.Conclusion. Cellular automaton models with intercellular boundaries have great potential for modeling the impact of restrictive measures on the course of an epidemic, making it possible to predict the dynamics of infected people based on the population data and the restrictive measures being introduced.

Publisher

FSPSI SCFHHRP

Subject

General Immunology and Microbiology,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference28 articles.

1. Demchuk AL, Kapistyn VM, Karateev AYu, Emelyanova NN, Dashkina IV, Pashin MM, et al. The possibilities of quantitative analysis of the relationship between the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and the institutional characteristics of the countries of the world. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2021; 6(6-2): 133-144. (In Russ.). doi: 10.29413/ABS.2021-6.6-2.14

2. COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. URL: https://www. bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/covid-19-governmentresponse-tracker [date of access: 12.02.2022].

3. Greer SL, King EJ, Fonseca EM, Peralta-Santos A (eds). Coronavirus politics: The comparative politics and policy of COVID-19. University of Michigan Press; 2021. doi: 10.3998/mpub.11927713

4. Demchuk AL, Kapitsyn VM, Karateev AYu, Emel’yanova NN, Dashkina IV, Pashin MM. Severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, stringency of restrictive measures and institutional characteristics of the countries in the world: Approaches to quantitative analysis. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science. 2022; 2: 58-82. (In Russ.).

5. Von Neumann J. Theory of self-reproducing automata. University of Illinois Press; 1966.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3