Optimization of the Algorithm for Choosing the Surgical Treatment of Anterior Recurrent Instability of the Shoulder Joint

Author:

Chirkov N. N.1ORCID,Nikolaev N. S.2ORCID,Pashentsev Y. A.3ORCID,Alekseeva A. V.3ORCID,Yakovlev V. N.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Federal Center of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Endoprosthesis Replacement of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov

2. Federal Center of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Endoprosthesis Replacement of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov

3. Federal Center of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Endoprosthesis Replacement of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Abstract

Introduction. Chronic recurrent instability of the shoulder joint is a frequent outcome of conservative treatment oftraumatic dislocation of the shoulder (2.8–30 % of cases). Preoperative examination largely determines the outcome of surgical treatment of this pathology.The aim of the study was to provide a clinical assessment of the developed algorithm for the surgical treatment of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder joint instability. Materials and methods. The results of treatment of 98 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder joint instability were studied. Preoperative examination included clinical tests, MRI or CT with calculation of bone loss. Fifty-six patients (57.1 %) underwent Bankart operation, 14 patients (14.3 %) – Latarjet operation. Twenty-three patients (23.5 %) underwent Bankart + Remplissage surgery, and 5 (5.1 %) – Latarjet + remplissage. The result was assessed on the ROWE scale.Results. Bone defects significant in the formation of instability (“glenoid off track”) were found in 19.4 % of patients, and “glenoid on track” – in 80.6 %. According to the proposed algorithm for treating patients with anterior recurrent instability of the shoulder joint, the “glenoid off track” state was an indication for Latarjet surgery. When “glenoid on track” was used, indications for Bankart operation were displayed. The remplissage procedure was indicated in case of the presence of a Hill-Sachs grade 3 defect or the presence of hyperelasticity of the tissues of the shoulder joint. The mean ROWE score for the entire group of patients before surgery was 41.5 ± 12.8 points, and 15 months after sur gery – 94.9 ± 3.4 points. Two recurrent dislocations were revealed, one of which was associated with repeated trauma, and the other – with an incorrect choice of stabilization technique. One complication (axillary nerve neuropathy) was observed, which was arrested conservatively.Conclusions. The proposed algorithm allowed us to obtain positive results in 97.9 % of cases. 

Publisher

FSPSI SCFHHRP

Reference15 articles.

1. Goncharov YN, Devis AY, Akimkina AM, Dadayev MKh, Golubev VG. Treatment of shoulder joint instability based on comprehensive diagnostics. Byulleten’ Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2014; 5(34): 73-78. (In Russ.)

2. Monastyrev VV, Sidorova GV, Vasil’yev VYu, Puseva ME. Searching for ways to optimize surgical treatment of post-traumatic anteromedial instability of the shoulder in young and working-age patients. Byulleten’ Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2010; 5(75): 93-98. (In Russ.)

3. Akimkina AM, Goncharov YN., Rodionov AV., Znamenskiy IA. Possibilities of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of shoulder joint instability. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Meditsina. 2012; 4: 72-78. (In Russ.)

4. Magnuson JA, Wolf BR, Cronin KJ, Jacobs CA, Ortiz SF, Kuhn JE. Surgical outcomes in the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, and Severity (FEDS) classification system for shoulder instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29(4): 784-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.002

5. White AE, Patel NK, Hadley CJ, Dodson CC. An algorithmic approach to the management of shoulder instability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2019; 3(12): e19.00168. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00168

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3