Abstract
This article systematically reviewed literature on agricultural market reforms, value chains and gender, selected from Global South developing countries to generate evidence on the changes in smallholder agricultural value chains and gender relations, following liberalization reforms. The study specifically aimed to; identify and critically analyse previous attempts to categorize agricultural value chains; and provide new value chain categorizations and associated gender relations. We found that only 5% of the reviewed 60 publications have attempted to categorize agricultural value chains, however with no consideration of gender relations. A new value chain typology has been provided as: “Traditional”, Digitally-led”, “Group-led” and “Firm-led” value chains, respectively basing on 13%, 35%, 32%, and 24% of the publications. With regard to gender relations, the main finding was that unequal gender relations are inherent in all forms of value chains but tend to be experienced differently by value chain actors –men and women – depending on the type of value chain. The commonly identified underlying factors for gender inequality included; patriarchal structures that bestow upon men decision-making power and control over production resources mostly land. Related were social norms that confine women to the domestic realm, proscribe their mobility and participation in higher value chain nodes and farmer groups. Lastly were gender disparities in education, skills and income leading to differences in access, ownership and use of ICTs. From the results, we note that inasmuch as different forms of value chains present some opportunities for actors, the evolution in smallholder value chains continues to engender equality challenges, mostly affecting women. We contributed to filling the knowledge gap on transformations in post-reform value chains and its effect on gender relations.
Reference97 articles.
1. Abate, G. T., Abay, K. A., Chamberlin, J., Kassim, Y., Spielman, D. J., & Tabe-Ojong, M. P. J. (2023). Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet, and what will it take to get there? Food Policy, 116, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102439
2. Adenegan, K., Adams, O., & Nwauwa, L. (2013). Gender impacts of small-scale farm households on agricultural commercialisation in Oyo state, Nigeria. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 3(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.9734/BJEMT/2013/1910
3. Adong, A. (2014). Impact of households' membership of farmer groups on the adoption of agricultural technologies in Uganda: evidence from the Uganda census of agriculture 2008/09.AgrEkon, 53(2), 108-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2014.
4. Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining' and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799.
5. AGRA. (2017). Africa agriculture status report: the business of smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Available at: https://agra.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Final-AASR-2017-Aug-28.pdf.